Philosophy Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 171 - 180

I will lose this debate.

newbiehere
Emmo

Sometimes, debates aren't about winning; they're about losing, and this is one such debate. Voters are free to interpret the goal of this debate as they wish and may vote accordingly. I have selected Emmo as my opponent because he expressed an interest in debating with me in the comment of another post. My goal is to lose this debate.Throughout this debate, I will argue that regardless of my overall rank, skill, etc. as a debator, I will do a terrible job in this particular deba...

Post Voting Period
10 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

The Impossibility of Impossibility

9spaceking
demonlord343

Within this debate I will be arguing about a very serious topic: the impossibility of impossibility. Is impossibility possible? Or is it impossible? That is the question. So here, we come, to debate about this question that has been pondered over many many years, perhaps even centuries. We question about the existence of impossibility. Could everything be possible after all? I don't think so. I think there exists some impossibility, and thus, impossibility is proved possible.pro will...

Post Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 6 Months Ago

Voluntaryism is Morally, Economically, and Socially Better for Society than Statism

StatismHeretic
Melvinotis

The Debate will follow a few simple guidelines. When stating a fact or statistic, sources must be posted. If one side resorts to personal attacks (Ad hominem,) they forfeit the debate. One's "view" or "opinion" can be "irrational, stupid, or retarded," but the person them self is not. (I don't think we will have a problem with this.) I will post my opening statement to address my opinion on the topic, and I will expect the opposition to post their opinion in the same manner. I will follow with m...

Post Voting Period
3 Comments
Updated 6 Months Ago

All actions are meaningless from an objective perspective.

Unspired
doomswatter

I will attempt to argue that all conscious actions or thoughts originating from a conscious observer are essentially meaningless.By meaningless, I am trying to suggest, among other things, that all actions and thoughts effectively lead to an empty goal. With respect to life, it is my position that life constantly reproduces itself with no meaningful objective.At some point, life can be said to have begun. The cause for this beginning is likely a result of essentially...

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 4 Months Ago

If a tree falls in a forest, and there is no one to hear it, it does not make a sound

zmikecuber
Krazzy_Player

Resolution: If a tree falls in a forest, and there is no one there to hear it, it does not make a sound.I shall be arguing in favor of the above resolution. The BoP shall be shared. That is, I shall argue the above statement is true, my opponent shall argue that it is false (that it does make a sound.)

Post Voting Period
32 Comments
Updated 8 Months Ago

the golden rule in application is unclear

linate
Pfalcon1318

do unto others as you'd have them do unto you. one might argue the golden rule is clear, but could only referring in that instance that the rule is stated clearly. i agree with that. that's why i said 'in application' in the opening statement, it's not clear. if it is clear, what are the guiding principles that can determine how to act in accordance with it? instead of a mess of ideas, given this idea is hard for me to discuss in the abstract, i will give an example. for example. Joh...

Post Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

(MiG Tournament) Physical laws must conform to preconceptions of what is logical

KRFournier
RoyLatham

This debate is part of round 5 of Man-Is-Good's Debate Tournament.SynopsisRoyLatham and I just finished another tournament debate over the implications of the KCA, which you can reference here:http://www.debate.org/debate/25114/In this debate, we argued over whether or not something that is mathematically possible can be considered to therefore be physically p...

Post Voting Period
39 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

It is more likely than not that an afterlife does not exist

socialpinko
thett3

===Resolution===The Pro will have the primary burden of proof in formulating and defending an argument against the existence of an afterlife. Con's burden will be to deconstruct and refute Pro's case. ===Definitions===An afterlife is defined as "the concept of a realm, or the realm itself (whether physical or transcendental), in which an essential part of an individual's identity or consciousness continues to reside after the death o...

Post Voting Period
26 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

The Normative Contingency Thesis (NCT) is a compelling objection to Moral Realism.

Cody_Franklin
OMGJustinBieber

I've finally decided to open this up to any and all challengers. Everyone knows me, my argument, and my method. All that's missing is someone to take up the fight. As a consequence of this openness, Con may begin presenting arguments for realism/against the NCT in Round 1, or may choose merely to accept and defer argumentation until Round 2. I leave that decision to my opponent, who may not be penalized for opting t...

Post Voting Period
15 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

Freedom or Political Correctness, choice or command.

Max.Wallace
KhalifV

My definition of freedom is that you can say whatever you want, and whoever hears it should be able to laugh it off, the old sticks and stones mentality. My definition of political correctness is that if you say anything offensive, and a power hungry entity such as Al Sharpton or Ellen hears you, you will be torn down. Political correctness is a nanny mentality, both for the nanny, those with power, and the poor offended adult child. The first amendment rules!!!!!!!!!!...

Post Voting Period
22 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago