Science Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 11 - 20

Cows Are Evil

Uberdragon
CowsAgainstHumanity

Hello, and welcome to the the debate over whether or not cows are evil. Uberdragon (me) is representing the pro side, while CowsAgainstHumanity (my good friend) is representing the con side. Before I begin may I say good luck to both of us. To begin, I hereby proclaim that all cow bovine things are super evil. Have you ever noticed that your cows are secretly plotting against you? Yes, they are! Your favorite milk creating four legged farm toy wants to shoot you and then rape your sexy wife...

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 3 Weeks Ago

Is evolution more reliable than creationism?

ignoramusslapper
CheetoGo

Evolution is clearly more reliable than creationism. In fact, we have observed evolution: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/gene-genesis-scientists/. In this article, you will find that genes have been observed to evolve from mutated ones. Creationism, on the other hand, has no evidence at all. Creationists rely on taking the few holes in the theory of evolution, and acting like that is proof of god. This is just not correct. While there is no way to prove there is no god, there is no wa...

Post Voting Period
11 Comments
Updated 3 Weeks Ago

the big bang is just another unrealistic theory

Rahma-ali
Mister_Man

*message if you would like to debate against me* The big bang theory; a theory that scientists suggest how the earth and universe was created. The big bang theory is rather a unrealistic theory, saying that the universe was created by a spontaneous explosion which created what is now the universe. how can such perfect and planned like universe be created witch an explosion? Such theory goes against religious views; God and his creation....

Post Voting Period
13 Comments
Updated 2 Weeks Ago

Anthropogenic Climate Change Exists

brant.merrell
RoyLatham

First round, acceptance....

Post Voting Period
30 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Evolution

funnycn
goalex

I believe evolution is true. Con must prove evolution is not true or is mostly false.This is a debate about evolution. If you choose to accept, follow these rulesi. First round is acceptance.ii. If you use the bible as a source, you must have another source to back up the claim. You may NOT use two bible sources. If you igno...

Post Voting Period
7 Comments
Updated 2 Weeks Ago

The Genesis account is scientifically viable.

a_drumming_dog
KalleS

I will be arguing that the account of creation in the book of Genesis, specifically Genesis 1:1-2:3, is scientifically viable. This is my first debate so don't expect me to be amazing haha....

Post Voting Period
17 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

for human survival, more focus should be on expanding into space

dairygirl4u2c
wiro

eventually mankind on earth will be extinct. who knows why, but it will happen. asteroid, our sun exploding, natural disasters, etc. before then, we need to have established colonies outside the solar system, and much further into the future, outside our galaxy....

Post Voting Period
3 Comments
Updated 2 Weeks Ago

The earth is probably less than 10,000 years old.

GarretKadeDupre
bluesteel

In this debate, Pro will argue the evidence that the earth is younger than 10,000 years, and Con will argue the evidence that the earth is older than 10,000 years. The debate is to be determined by the preponderance of evidence. Years are taken as units of time in the conventional sense as presently measured, not in an allegorical or poetic sense.The claim that the earth is less than 10,000 years old is part of Young Earth Creationism (YEC). In this debat...

Post Voting Period
104 Comments
Updated 7 Months Ago

The most basic living cell was Intelligently Designed

Mhykiel
Sswdwm

The first basic living cells were intelligently designed. serious debate....

Post Voting Period
114 Comments
Updated 5 Months Ago

Young Earth Creationism is negated by much of modern science, not just the theory of evolution.

MykSkodar
smarken41

In this debate, I will argue that Young Earth Creationism conflicts with much of modern science, not just the theory of evolution. As such, it is an untenable position. My opponent will defend that this is not the case either by demonstrating how much of modern science is in agreement with the YEC worldview or by refuting my claims (or both). To keep the debate short and sweet, I have set argument max to 5,000 characters with a 48 hour response time. Please ensure you are available enough...

Post Voting Period
24 Comments
Updated 2 Weeks Ago