Philosophy Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 201 - 210

This house believes ethical egoism is false

Stephen_Hawkins
YYW

The rules of this debate are rather straight forward:1) There is to be no use of separation of arguments through subheadings or headings, or any technique other than basic essay writing (that is, paragraph-by-paragraph). 2) The definition of ethical egoism is roughly that moral agents value only their self-interest. This definition may be contested, but massive departure from its meaning counts as a forfeit of the debate.3) 4,000 characters, f...

Post Voting Period
57 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

It should be considered morally wrong to kill sentient animals, without consent, for their meat

Caploxion
kbub

Hi, kbub. 5 rounds, 2 week voting period, 48 hours to argue and 8k characters. Standard debate rules (first round acceptance and last round is not for new arguments). I understand that you're busy at the moment, but if you find some time, I'll be ready for you. If you want anything changed, feel free to ask me....

Post Voting Period
86 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

Existence

Cold-Mind
TheCoolestPersonEver

Resolution: The best definition of "existing"(as adjective) is "can possibly be registered by human senses(either directly or indirectly)" My opponent will make his definition in Round 1. In rounds 2 and 3, we will both argue why our definition is better. Voting rules: - Reliable sources are not taken into account - Forfeit means loss...

Post Voting Period
4 Comments
Updated 7 Months Ago

An Omniscient God and Human Free Will are Incompatible

xXCryptoXx
Domr

FrameworkThis is a debate about God, and the concept of foreknowledge and how it relates to free will. I will be defending that free will and omniscience are compatible, that is that they can both exist without contradiction. My opponent will be arguing they are incompatible, that is that they cannot both exist without contradiction. My opponent will have the burden of proof in this debate since he is...

Post Voting Period
31 Comments
Updated 5 Months Ago

This House Believes That the No Difference Theory is correct

Stephen_Hawkins
16kadams

Hello, and welcome to my next debate. 16kadams, probably one of the most formidable and respected debaters on this site for conservative beliefs against myself, it certainly shall be an interesting debate. ===Opening Jokes==='My Dad used to say 'always fight fire with fire', which is probably why he got thrown out of the fire brigade.'===Definitions===No difference theory: The rejection of necessary differe...

Post Voting Period
32 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

The Grim Reaper Paradox

Vernich
Sswdwm

If there were an actually infinite number of Grim Reapers tasked with your death at a uniform interval from 1pm to 2pm, and the first Reaper strikes at 1:30, the second at 1:15, and so on... then you can't both live or die in that hour interval.

Post Voting Period
41 Comments
Updated 10 Months Ago

Though experiments are important.

alyfish126
Samreay

I will be arguing in support of the following three statements:If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, it does not make a noise.A train is running out of control down a track. In its path are five people who have been tied to the track. Fortunately, you could flip a switch, which will lead the train down a different track to safet...

Post Voting Period
26 Comments
Updated 7 Months Ago

"Livestock" slaughter is acceptable

LiamWhlaes
kbub

This is a duplication of a debate started by kbub and I was pipped to the post by a more worthy adversary but we have agreed to also have the debate ourselves. The official resolution is: "The practice of humans' killing "livestock" animals for food in the US ought to continue (Is the preferred of the two possible worlds)" The "practice" may include ANY practices of "livestock" slaughter, including so-named "humane" slaughter practices. "Practice" limitation However, neither hypothetic...

Post Voting Period
13 Comments
Updated 7 Months Ago

We Cannot Create Artificial Intelligence via Computation Alone

n7
UndeniableReality

After some discussion in my past debate, UndeniableReality would seem to be a good opponent to debate this with. Definitions: Artificial Intelligence (as defined by Searle): The claim that an "appropriately programmed computer with the right inputs and outputs would thereby have a mind in exactly the same sense human beings have minds." Computation: "process following a well-defined model understood and expressed as, for example, an algorithm, or a protocol."...

Post Voting Period
101 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Does Abortion Kill a Human Being?

JoshBrahm
jeeoh

I believe abortion kills a human being. We know the unborn is biologically a member of the human species, because she comes from human parents. Her DNA could also be tested in utero, and we would always find that she has human DNA. Most pro-abortion-choice people, however, agree with the above statement. Their issue is usually the question of whether the human entity killed is a "person," or a member of our species that has basic rights. The pro-choice ad...

Voting Period
70 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago