'My Dad used to say 'always fight fire with fire', which is probably why he got thrown out of the fire brigade.'
No difference theory: The rejection of necessary differe...
I am CON.
1. No semantics.
2. First Round for acceptance, and rule and definition clearification only.
3. No new arguments in the last round.
4. Text-only debate.
Thank you for tuning in to the second of possibly more presidential debates among some of the most well known fictional people in history who are running for President of the United States of America...... Tonight we have Peter Griffin vs Eric Cartman, who each represent the two major political parties in the race.
My name is Tim Tebow, I will be tonights moderator because im still riding the...
The debate is simply as the resolution stands. No squirreling of terminology to change the intended purpose of debate, the division of labour is mostly on myself (though my opponent should present a counterplan).
The round structures should be as followed:
R1 - Acceptance and any opening remarks.
R2 - An explanation of your ethical system. There should not be serious engagement with the opposition's argument, though i...
I love taking a brake from harsh banter back and forth in these debates. What better way then one of these? Rules: Jokes begin in round two. Dirty jokes allowed but not a lot of profanity if possible. Thanks to whoever accepts this challenge, and good luck....
Round 1 is for acceptance. New arguments can be introduced in rounds 2 and 3. Round 4 is reserved for rebuttals, extension of arguments and a final wrapping up. Round 5 is for reply. Sources do not have to be cited for this debate. I would like to thank my opponent in advance and look forward to a engaging, civilized debate....
I strongly belive that yoga pants look wayyy better on the majority of women, as opposed to skinny jeans.
Cussin' isn't poor conduct it is actually encourage.
Please do not drag in other members from this site into the rap battle.
1st round is acceptance.
If any rules are violated then all 7 points go to the opponent no questions asked.
The format is simple; introduction, rebuttal, conclusion. We will be debating idiotically about the subject of why people hate atheists. If you take it seriously, you lose. The stance that will be defended by me in this idiot debate; when people are rejected, they usually feel a bit of anger. They may even feel hatred towards the rejector. People whom hold god close enough have a feel that atheists reject them by rejecting their god- for it is a projection of their version of the perfect b...
It is just dumb to fill up the debates with super hero's and Pokemon stuff. There are actually people doing assignments trying to find debates to go to the next grade to graduate. Really grow up ... For all I care go on to wiki answers , yahoo answers. But this is a professional site that is supposed to be used for important debates. Thank you!...