Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 21 - 30

Resolved: Gun Ban in the US

fire_wings
missmozart

IntroductionThis will be for missmozart, as we agreed to debate, and it happended to be this topic. It's been around 2 months since I debated a gun debate, and I like doing this topic, so I will be doing it right now. In this debate, the voting standards wil...

Post Voting Period
388 Comments
Updated 6 Months Ago

Via Intelligent Design, an infinitely-inteligent, creator god cannot be logically justified

Zarroette
Envisage

Via Intelligent Design, an infinitely-inteligent, creator god cannot be logically justifiedDefinitions Intelligent Design: is an argument for the existence of god or, more generally, for an intell...

Post Voting Period
385 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

Evolution is a complete fabrication without a shred of evidence

Kleptin
DATCMOTO

I would first like to thank my opponent for accepting this debate, and the audience for their time and participation. This debate is a challenge to the member DATCMOTO who asserted in this thread: http://www.debate.org/forums/religion/topic/1796/5/ That "Evolution is a complete fabrication without a shred of evidence". I would assume that DATCMOTO is a man of his word and means what he says. If this is the case, then I would like to challenge this assertion. I personally believe that th...

Post Voting Period
357 Comments
Updated 7 Years Ago

Atheism says there is no God, therefore it is not possible to win Pascal's Wager.

LifeMeansGodIsGood
medv4380

I would like an atheist to argue that it is possible to win Pascal's Wager and remain an atheist at the same time, but it seems to me that an atheist would not argue this way as it allows for the possibility that God is there and atheism excludes that possibility.. A non-atheist can argue this debate against my position. Please give a sample argument in the comments before I allow you to accept this challenge. If you need a dictionary to define words or if you need a web page link to define o...

Post Voting Period
356 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

The user known as Danielle used dishonest tactics in her same-sex parenting debate.

MouthWash
Danielle

Many people on this site know about me and Danielle's same-sex parenting debate, in which she won by a large margin and I accused her of using dishonest arguments (lawyering, strawmen, etc) in order to gain victory.In case you haven't, here's the link: [http://debate.org/debates/Homosexual-couples-can-raise-children-just-as-well-as-heterosexual-couples./1/]I...

Post Voting Period
349 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

1 extended question that destroys science

vi_spex
2-D

science cant prove aliens are not true based on lack of evidence, so does that mean that aliens are true or false to a science believer? and based on what?...

Post Voting Period
347 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

Grammar makes little difference to a phrase's meaning and clarity

dylancatlow
Zaradi

I will be arguing pro, that correct grammar and spelling make little difference to a phrase's coherency. I will take the burden of proof in this debate. Definitions: 1) Little - Small in size, amount, or degree (often used to convey an appealing diminutiveness or express an affectionate or condescending attitude). <--- in this case its definition will be that of its degree usage. 2) Meaning - What is meant by something. 3) Clarity - The quality of being clear, in particular. The quali...

Post Voting Period
344 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

Is the Bible against women's rights?

foxxhajti
FollowerofChrist1955

The Bible has multiple quotes against the rights of women. In my opinion, it is a pretty outdated book reflecting the ideologies and philosophies of society during that era. Some quotes from the Bible which reflect this: 1) "You shall not covet your neighbor"s house. You shall not covet your neighbor"s wife, or his male or female servant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor." Exodus 20:17 - Neither men nor women should be considered anyone's properties by any mean...

Post Voting Period
339 Comments
Updated 12 Months Ago

It is rational to place faith in the invisible pink unicorn.

izbo10
Grape

You start the debate: You can not add anything in the last round. The rule is simple you must defend this being a valid argument for the Invisible Pink Unicorn. I will say it is not. Since you agreed with this fo god, you should have no problem with this for the invisible pink unicorn.My opponent declares that appealing to faith when committing to the reality of Invisible Pink Unicorn, regardless of religious affiliation, is irrational and fallacious. I intend to show that, quit...

Voting Period
338 Comments
Updated 5 Years Ago

Germans should not be offended when they get called "Nazi" (I think it's a compliment)

Adam2
Fanath

First round is for acceptance but here's a little intro by me: if I was a German I would take the Nazi remark as a compliment. For one, at least that country didn't go around conquering the world the way the Brits and Scandinavian countries did. (And don't even get me started on the way Denmark mistreats Greenland.)As I always say Hitler was much better than these two guys I put who are equal to each other in terms of being a total douche

Post Voting Period
336 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago