Science Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 21 - 30

Homeopathy-It works

SPARTANTEAMLOGIC
kasmic

Rules for debate- Scientific/theoretical proof required, no pointless religious claims without proof (For both sides) Anyone can accept Please elaborate on any proof taken and please cite your sources. Wikipedia is acceptable (as long as sources seem legit) My argument- There is no scientific proof whatsoever that Homeopathy has medicinal properties and the reason some people get cured is a pure Placebo....

Voting Period
10 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

DDO Tier Tournament 2-Flat Earth Theory vs Spherical Earth Theory

Wylted
Romanii

Pro will be providing evidence for Flat Earth Theory. Con will be provided evidence of a round Earth. The debate should be determined by preponderance of evidence.There are to be no semantics with the terms round Earth or flat Earth. Neither round Earth theory or Flat Earth theory doubt topographical differences.First round is for acceptance. P.s. Romanii wanted me to add this. Round earth theory doesn't necessarily mean a perfect sphere. Just like flat Earth theory wo...

Post Voting Period
184 Comments
Updated 4 Months Ago

is homosexuality wrong from a non religious stand point?

sabarashy
kebomystic

Yes because it goes against darwinian evolution...

Post Voting Period
3 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

Evolution is how the universe and Earth began.

TheodoretheMan
vwv

Evolution is the prime belief of America. The universe came about when massive amounts of energy spewed through time and space leaving traces known as planets, stars, comets, etc. When Earth was young, it was barren and desolate, but it needed to thrive to survive in the new born galaxy. The energy of the Big Bang combined with mass from the Earth started to form plants and small creatures. To survive young Earths nasty weather, these microscopic particles had to evolve. Over long periods of tim...

Post Voting Period
3 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

Cows Are Evil

Uberdragon
CowsAgainstHumanity

Hello, and welcome to the the debate over whether or not cows are evil. Uberdragon (me) is representing the pro side, while CowsAgainstHumanity (my good friend) is representing the con side. Before I begin may I say good luck to both of us. To begin, I hereby proclaim that all cow bovine things are super evil. Have you ever noticed that your cows are secretly plotting against you? Yes, they are! Your favorite milk creating four legged farm toy wants to shoot you and then rape your sexy wife...

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

Anthropogenic Climate Change Exists

brant.merrell
RoyLatham

First round, acceptance....

Post Voting Period
30 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Is evolution more reliable than creationism?

ignoramusslapper
CheetoGo

Evolution is clearly more reliable than creationism. In fact, we have observed evolution: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/gene-genesis-scientists/. In this article, you will find that genes have been observed to evolve from mutated ones. Creationism, on the other hand, has no evidence at all. Creationists rely on taking the few holes in the theory of evolution, and acting like that is proof of god. This is just not correct. While there is no way to prove there is no god, there is no wa...

Post Voting Period
11 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

The earth is probably less than 10,000 years old.

GarretKadeDupre
bluesteel

In this debate, Pro will argue the evidence that the earth is younger than 10,000 years, and Con will argue the evidence that the earth is older than 10,000 years. The debate is to be determined by the preponderance of evidence. Years are taken as units of time in the conventional sense as presently measured, not in an allegorical or poetic sense.The claim that the earth is less than 10,000 years old is part of Young Earth Creationism (YEC). In this debat...

Post Voting Period
104 Comments
Updated 8 Months Ago

The most basic living cell was Intelligently Designed

Mhykiel
Sswdwm

The first basic living cells were intelligently designed. serious debate....

Post Voting Period
114 Comments
Updated 5 Months Ago

A Sentient Alien Species, if they exist, will likely look humanoid

LogicalLunatic
bsh1

First Round is for acceptance. Burden of Proof is on me. Last Round is for rebuttals only. No profanity, no sexually explicit language, no violent threats, and no trolling. By humanoid, I mean a life form with anatomical symmetry, two arms, two legs, and upright stature, as well as perhaps some other human features which I may include later. Let's be flexible enough to allow for slight deviation from this this definition, as long as overall the lifeform is humanoid. May the better debater...

Post Voting Period
12 Comments
Updated 2 Weeks Ago