Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 21 - 30

killing these homos is not immoral (they are too different than us)

dairygirl4u2c
dannyc

H. habilis H. erectus H. rudolfensis H. georgicus H. ergaster H. antecessor H. cepranensis H. heidelbergensis H. neanderthalensis H. rhodesiensis H. sapiens idaltu H. floresiensis...

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

man loves woman out of compulsion, not out of necessity

juras
Truth_seeker

hello! the statement is man loves woman out of compulsion and not out of necessity. i stand firmly for the motion. love developed among man and woman for the sake of their offspring. man and woman needed to come together and well have sex. but just because a man and a woman reproduces doesn't mean that they love each other. it is a social and biological compulsion borne out of concern of offspring....

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

the golden rule in application is unclear

dairygirl4u2c
Astal3

do unto others as you'd have them do unto you. one might argue the golden rule is clear, but could only referring in that instance that the rule is stated clearly. i agree with that. that's why i said 'in application' in the opening statement, it's not clear. if it is clear, what are the guiding principles that can determine how to act in accordance with it? instead of a mess of ideas, given this idea is hard for me to discuss in the abstract, i will give an example....

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

Resolved: Vaccination is Beneficial

InnovativeEphemera
Domr

Previously participated in this debate, however after much effort opponent forfeited in the second round. I will port my opening here. 10k characters, 4 rounds. I expect evidence to back up your BoP in demonstrating that, on balance, vaccinations are not safe and beneficial, just as I will provide evidence where I bear the BoP for demonstrating my arguments.I take no issue with giving you the opportunity to see my arguments prior to the debate.

Post Voting Period
42 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

the golden rule in application is not clear

dairygirl4u2c
Phoenix61397

do unto others as you'd have them do unto you the golden rule is not clear my thoughts are not very organized. maybe after a few debates they will be better. if it is clear, what are the guiding principles that can determine how to act in accordance with it? some intervention v deferrence hypotheticals: -someone is setting of fireworks close to the road, but it's debatable if it's too close. alternatively, someone is setting off fireworks with people around, but it's debateable if...

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

USA should have more restrictions on guns

dairygirl4u2c
Sky55Anchorage

argued here before, but this has some reformulated edits. the USA is pretty unique because of how pervasive our support of gun culture is (why nothing at all really passes, even something as simple as more background check restrictions, even after so many mass shootings), and guns themselves. we may not be like other countries that have done so much so successfully (perhaps even to the point that more gun access could reduce violence when 'good guys' have guns? not sure i'd go that far), but...

Post Voting Period
14 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

Trolling is just a label, a name calling kind of thing.

Max.Wallace
Domr

Most debaters are trolls, unless they are debating an inconsequential issue with humor or another featherweight issue. Trolling is normal with whoever takes a side as someone on the other side of serious issues will have an emotional response even if the instigator dumbs it down with PC language. I am proud to troll, but calling me a troll is insulting, however offensive and stupid the anti troll's beliefs are. Calling someone a troll is a defense mechanism, it is basically saying that the troll...

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

Rap battle

Truth_seeker
ShadowKingStudios

First round acceptance, no rules...

Post Voting Period
12 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

the 'unlimited paradox' - the unlimited is proven to be a false idea

dairygirl4u2c
Domr

the 'unlimited paradox' - the unlimited is proven to be a false idea weakest point. the unlimited paradox states that an immovable object cannot exist at the same time as an unstoppable force. the fact that it cannot exist at the same time, shows that the unlimited truly doesn't exist. better point. an immovable rock cannot be created that can be lifted by an unstoppable force....

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

Life on earth has no intrinsic value.

Stanoneman
maddiezieglerfan

The assumptions for this argument: 1. There is no afterlife. 2. Human beings are headed toward extinction either through self-inflicted or natural catastrophe....

Post Voting Period
9 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago