Science Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 21 - 30

Should we be allowed to clone

21frykahla
SavvyShafe

No, we shouldn't be able to clone because it devalues human lives. If you clone yourself then you are just a copy there is nothing special about you. The success rate of cloning is very low and it is very expensive. If I was to have a pet that died then why would I spend $100,000 to get an exact clone of the dog when I can buy like 4 dogs for that price? We might even develop a new disease from forming new genes. People who are cloned maybe viewed differently or viewed as a lesser citizen then a...

Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

morality=survival truth

vi_spex
Bennett91

if a gigantic powerful highly advanced friendly warrior robot crash lands on earth without possibility of escape, that if threatened or in the face of violence will protect anyone and itself, does it make sense to attack it?...

Post Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 2 Weeks Ago

Anthropogenic global climate change.

Stupidape
Repcon

I will contend that anthropegenic climate change exists. The contender will contend that anthropegenic climate change is non-existent.StructureR1 Acceptance & definitionsR2 ArgumentsR3 RebuttalsR4 DefenseBurden of proofBurden of proof will be shared equally. This is because I am making the affrimative claim and the instiagator, yet am arguing for what is normally accepted in the scientific comm...

Post Voting Period
5 Comments
Updated 2 Weeks Ago

Intelligent Design ( Pro ) vs Evolution ( con )

Moelogy
Zaephou

Round one - acceptance only Round two - Opening arguements (no rebuttals) Round three and four - Rebuttals Round Five - Closing statements (no rebuttals) Whoever accepts has to argue that the evolution of Darwin is superior to Intelligent Design BOP is shared Rules : - No cussing - No forefeiting - Please do not accept this debate if you are not going to bare until the end....

Debating Period
2 Comments
Updated 2 Weeks Ago

morality=survival truth

vi_spex
Bennett91

if a gigantic powerful highly advanced friendly warrior robot crash lands on earth without possibility of escape, that if threatened or in the face of violence will protect anyone and itself, does it make sense to attack it?...

Post Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 2 Weeks Ago

Evolution > Creationism

Spud
Mike_10-4

I'm already in a debate about Young Earth Creationism in regards to age of the Earth and Universe, so I thought I'd make a different debate discussing a different topic; though somewhat related. This topic is about the theory of evolution. Anyone who has an issue with the theory of evolution and wants to discuss it, is more than welcome to come and debate....

Post Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 2 Weeks Ago

Is there any scientific evidence for creationism

Spud
rigadoon

I'm a fairly passionate person about science and I've been debating creationism for nearly 6 years. If you've got any evidence to present for creationism, I'd like to hear it. It'd be good to hear a new argument to be honest, and I'm hopefully going to get more competent opponents than I do on YouTube comment sections, considering that this website is made for the soul purpose of debating XD. Anyways, if anyone would be able to debate me about this, would be cool; thanks....

Post Voting Period
33 Comments
Updated 2 Weeks Ago

morality=survival truth

vi_spex
firefury14620

if a gigantic powerful highly advanced friendly warrior robot crash lands on earth without possibility of escape, that if threatened or in the face of violence will protect anyone and itself, does it make sense to attack it?...

Post Voting Period
32 Comments
Updated 2 Weeks Ago

Are Renewable Energy Sources Better than Fossil Fuels

Repcon
PowerPikachu21

Here is the debate structure: R1 Acceptance & definitions R2 Arguments R3 Rebuttals R4 Defense I will be arguing that fossil fuels are a better energy source than Renewable Energy Sources. My opponent will argue that Renewable Energy Sources are a better energy source than Fossil Fuels. Round One- Agree upon definitions if any, and accept debate rules Round Two- Present arguments without rebuking what the opposing debater argued. So if I presented my argument first, you cannot rebu...

Debating Period
0 Comments
Updated 2 Weeks Ago

The Bodily Resurrection of Jesus Christ Historically Occurred

divergent_ambon
Kollo

First Round is acceptance, treating first round as anything but acceptance is a forfeit. Read all instructions for pre-acceptance requirements. Last opponent did not and garnered an automatic forfeit.This debate is over whether Jesus, a Judean individual in the first century, rose from the dead historically as recorded in the canonical Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

Debating Period
1 Comments
Updated 2 Weeks Ago