Philosophy Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 21 - 30

Flaws are mostly objective

000ike
Rational_Thinker9119

To avoid any semantics, I offer these 2 definitions as conditions of acceptance.Flaw: a feature that is regarded as unfavorableObjective: based on facts rather than thoughts or opinionsRound 1 is for acceptance. ...

Post Voting Period
144 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

Is Homosexuality Objectively Disordered?

GarretKadeDupre
Soldus

TOPIC: Is homosexuality objectively disordered?PRO: I will be arguing that homosexuality is objectively disordered.CON: My opponent will be expected to prove that homosexuality is not objectively disordered....

Post Voting Period
22 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

Homos should not be allowed to vote

LifeMeansGodIsGood
Dishoungh

homos should not be allowed to vote...

Post Voting Period
281 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Germans should not be offended when they get called "Nazi" (I think it's a compliment)

Adam2
Fanath

First round is for acceptance but here's a little intro by me: if I was a German I would take the Nazi remark as a compliment. For one, at least that country didn't go around conquering the world the way the Brits and Scandinavian countries did. (And don't even get me started on the way Denmark mistreats Greenland.)As I always say Hitler was much better than these two guys I put who are equal to each other in terms of being a total douche

Post Voting Period
336 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

objective morality does not exist!

izbo10
JustCallMeTarzan

In this debate the burden of proof shall be on mattrodstrom to show objective morality does not exist. He must prove beyond any doubt whatsoever it absolutely does not exist. He will start and can not debate in the last round....

Voting Period
83 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

I can disprove the 4-color map theorem

m93samman
LaissezFaire

The four-color-map theorem, demonstrated here [1], is a theory that declares that "every possible geographical map can be colored with at most four colors in su...

Post Voting Period
59 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

It is probable that God exists

Contradiction
FourTrouble

TERMSResolved: It is probable that God exists.Rounds:1. Acceptance only2. Opening arguments3. Clash4. Closing arguments/clash For the purposes of this debate, the term "God" will be defined broadly as to include the general attributes (ie: omnipotence, omniscience) commonly associated with Judeo-Christian monoth...

Post Voting Period
87 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

"1+1" equals 3

themasteroffail
thett3

Ru prepared...

Post Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

Something needs to be done about vote bombs

qopel
royalpaladin

This website can be a lot of fun. Sure things can get heated and that's why there are points that can be lost or awarded based on rudeness. There are people, however (mostly teens) that think they are justified to be vigilantes and administer their own form of point awards with the use of vote bombs. This results in more vote bombs and votes that result trying to counter-act the vote bombs. Ultimately, this results in the entire voting system becoming useless. I would suggest a blocking m...

Post Voting Period
107 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

Weak Atheism is Logically Incoherent

KeytarHero
dirkson

I wish to debate the following proposition, that weak atheism is logically incoherent.Weak atheism is the position that rather than a positive belief that God does not exist, it is the "lack of belief in gods or God."Incoherent is defined as without logical or meaningful connection. [1][1] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/incoherent...

Post Voting Period
86 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago