Religion Debates

 
Filter By:
Showing: 31 - 40

It is not illogical to suppose the existence of God.

Smithereens
mediumsalsa

Motion: It is not illogical to suppose the existence of God.


Intro: In this debate I will attempt to argue that it is logical for someone to believe there is a God. Con will present a case to establish his assertion of the resolution's negation. BoP is shared. Mediumsalsa is someone i met 5 minutes ago in a youtube discussion, and this is the result :)

Definitions:
Illogical: no...

Post Voting Period
33 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

God does not exist.

KingDebater
rhema

I'll allow Rhema to start with her arguments.
...

Post Voting Period
15 Comments
Updated 3 Months Ago

Is God real and is the Bible accurate

steven.trellis
imnotsayingimjustsaying

First of all use your brain and think how can a living organism come from nonliving things.Okay so you must think that makes sense because even the simplest organisms need parts the function all at one time with instructions and these instructions can not come about just anywhere so someone had to create them and that being is God.Please don't just answer without ACCUAL knowlege of what you are saying.
...

Voting Period
3 Comments
Updated 3 Months Ago

Why God is Justified in His Actions and Why Humans Remain Ignorant

AaronTheGreat
x2MuzioPlayer

The reason humans do not understand God is because they refuse to place themselves in His position. It is obvious that humans are born babies and remain as such. Your brain does not evolve. Your brain does not change. The only thing that happens is that humans grow in size. Place yourself as the Supreme Creator or whatever name you may choose. It is only you, and a canvas of void. You may create, do, and establish whatever you please. You may lie to yourself for your own sake, but no matter what...

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 3 Months Ago

Does the God of the Bible condone slavery?

bladerunner060
GarretKadeDupre

In a forum post, Garret and I were discussing whether God ever condones slavery. (http://www.debate.org/forums/philosophy/topic/27945/12/)

He suggested I challenge him on the subject, so I am.

A few rules (And Con, please suggest any changes in the comments or in PM prior to acceptance):

Burden of Proof is on me (for obvious reasons). However, here is my proposal of the standard of evidence:

Pro...

Post Voting Period
24 Comments
Updated 3 Months Ago

Atheism has Proof, Evidence, Facts, Validity and Truth that it's Accurate, True and Correct.

Magic8000
Dale.G

Greetings FBI agent Dale. Resolution: Atheism has Proof, Evidence, Facts, Validity and Truth that it's Accurate, True and Correct. Rules: No Forfeits No Fallacies No Insults 72 Hours to Post 8000 Characters Max 1 Week Voting Period Round 1 is for acceptance only...

Post Voting Period
25 Comments
Updated 4 Months Ago

Christian book of Daniel - prophecy 2.0

Albert
Aceviper2011

I'm For - Book of Daniel speaks of events which 90% have already occurred. Jesus did refer to the book and Daniel, but my position is that the majority has already been fulfilled. Against - Will need to provide strong relation to directly link Daniel to 'apocalyptic' events, which would refers to future (aka 2012+ events). Rules, if my opponent agrees should help the debate run easier. -Short factual replies, if something takes an essay to say, it may lose it's meaning. -If a prophecy...

Post Voting Period
62 Comments
Updated 4 Months Ago

Vegan can be Christians and any scripture against so is hypocritical

BBoySuperBeast
Mindplay

This debate spirals from a previous debate whereby my well opponent seems to think that a vegan diet is wrong yet their is no moral change within the dieting of a person. That unbelievers refrain from animal produces and that I was pursuing animal produce brought out lower morals in humanity. Neither of these are fully the construction or fundamentally the argument. In every cake milk DNA suited for calves and the eggs of an unhatched birds are necessary ingredients for the feel of purity....

Post Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 5 Months Ago

The Argument for/Pro presented in the debate "Atheism is reasonably impossible" is flawed

StreetLogician
errya

I would like to take up the debate started by errya in "Atheism is reasonably impossible" since his opponent has not replied. The reader should note that the Pro position here is the Con position in other debate. The argument presented for/Pro "Atheism is reasonably impossible" is flawed. It is flawed primarily for two reasons. It relies on: 1. a false dilemma (Materialism or Folk Dualism) 2. a mistaken notion of "Natural Law" (dictated versus descriptive) The first round is to present a...

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 5 Months Ago

Atheism is Irrational

KanzulHuda786
Stephen_Hawkins

I would like to debate an atheism, i am going to be arguing that atheism is not reasonale, logical or scientific belief. First round for acceptance...

Post Voting Period
7 Comments
Updated 8 Months Ago