Science Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 41 - 50

Evolution vs Young Earth Creationism

triangle.128k
NewLifeChristian

This debate is reserved for NewLifeChristian. I will be arguing that Evolution is true and that the Earth is around 4.5 billion years old. NewLifeChristian will be arguing for Creation being true and that the Earth is around 6-10K years old. RulesNo trolling Reliable sources must be usedStructureRound 1: AcceptanceRound 2: Arguments only (no rebuttals)Rounds 3-4: Everything else

Post Voting Period
178 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

Is Vice Regent able to know reality from delusions?

What50
Surgeon

IF VICE REGENT IS UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO READ THIS WHOLE POST AND THEN RESPOND TO THE SINGLE QUESTION IT ASKS, GO AWAY. I FIND IT HILARIOUS THAT VICE REGENT KEEP VOMITING WORDS AND YET HASN'T ANSWERED ANY OF HIS DEBATES. Vice Regent loves to live under the delusion that he is the guardians of rationality. But how can he hold this title when they cannot even articulate a rational way to know truth from fiction. If he cannot do this, he is literally ignorant and the ignorant cannot guard anythi...

Debating Period
0 Comments
Updated 3 Months Ago

There is no such thing as a virus

Akhenaten
TechnoAngel

There are no viruses.There never has been any viruses in the past and there wont be any viruses in the future. That's because viruses don't exist. Viruses are just made up nonsense by the medical establishment and pharmaceutical companies so that they can make huge mega-dollars out of gullible people with drugs and vaccines. (Only people with some life experience can apply. That means no 16 year olds thanks.)...

Debating Period
14 Comments
Updated 3 Months Ago

The quantum fluctuations arguement dissproves the existence of God.

JimShady
cakerman

Whenever a theist puts forth the question "how does something come from nothing?", atheists have a very scientific and seemingly full proof answer of quantum fluctuations. Quantum fluctuations are "random fluctuations can produce matter and energy out of nothingness." [1] This is a source used from the seemingly atheist person I am debating. The article says that because of these quantum fluctuations, the universe/big bang can produce itself without need of a God. The article states "The Big...

Post Voting Period
50 Comments
Updated 6 Months Ago

Climate change is both real and a serious issue

NeuralNetwork
Captain3

OverviewThis debate session will be 5 rounds with 48 hours to conduct an argument. 10,000 characters are permitted for each response. Open voting will take place over 10 days with comments enabled.Rules Please try to use objective evidence and cite at the bottom of your argument Please try to use proper spelling and grammar...

Debating Period
5 Comments
Updated 10 Months Ago

Should people be able to keep exotic animals?

AnimalJamRocks
Mal618

One reason why people shouldn"t be able to keep exotic animals is because they are very hard to take care of. Exotic animals aren"t very good companions. They need lots of attention, space, and when they grow up, lots and lots of food. If the animals needs aren"t met, they could suffer....

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 10 Months Ago

Should we be able to genetically engineer humans?

Estudiante2016
MagicAintReal

We should not be able to genetically engineer humans because in doing so, we take away the right of diversity and individuality that each of us possess. It is also not fair to those who are genetically engineered. ...

Debating Period
1 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

Young Earth Creationism Is Not Possible

Subutai
Pennington

I hope you like the definitions chosen, and please agree to them before accepting the debate. Full Resolution Young earth creationism is possible. BoP is shared. Definitions Young Earth Creationism: "...the religious belief that the Universe, Earth and all life on Earth were created by direct acts of the Abrahamic God during a relatively short period, sometime between 5,700 and 10,000 years ago."[...

Post Voting Period
100 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

DDO Tier Tournament 2-Flat Earth Theory vs Spherical Earth Theory

Wylted
Romanii

Pro will be providing evidence for Flat Earth Theory. Con will be provided evidence of a round Earth. The debate should be determined by preponderance of evidence.There are to be no semantics with the terms round Earth or flat Earth. Neither round Earth theory or Flat Earth theory doubt topographical differences.First round is for acceptance. P.s. Romanii wanted me to add this. Round earth theory doesn't necessarily mean a perfect sphere. Just like flat Earth theory wo...

Post Voting Period
186 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

The city of Chicago being visible from the opposite shore, proves the earth is not a sphere.

Ramshutu2
Edlvsjd

One of Edlvsjd core arguments made in support of Flat earth (and against a spherical earth) is that the City of Chicago is visible from the opposite shore of Lake Michigan, something he states is not possible on a spherical earth, and effectively demonstrates that the earth is flat. This debate is Edlvsjd's opportunity to argue that this is the case. Rules: - As Edlvsjd is going to be supporting his claim, his FIRST round should be used for opening arguments; Edlvsjd should write "Last...

Post Voting Period
148 Comments
Updated 7 Months Ago