Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 51 - 60

Israel can only be explained by Biblical history and is protected by God.

LifeMeansGodIsGood
A341

Ask any Arab where Israel came from, and they will refer you to the Bible story (his-story, the "his" in history is God, it's God's story. True history is God's story and God keeps the record of it) Abraham is the Father of the Arabs and the Jews, the Arabs hate the Jews because they think al of God's promises were supposed to legally go to the firstborn son.......Abraham's firstborn son was Ishmael by Sara's handmaiden, and Isaac's firstborn son was Esau. Jacob, who later...

Debating Period
1 Comments
Updated 2 Days Ago

Who Would Make a Better Animorph?

LogicalLunatic
thett3

First of all, I would not normally challenge someone like Thett to a debate. These people have much more worthwhile things to do than to accept debate challenges from noobs. I will understand completely if Thett decides not to accept this debate. He's a busy guy. However, a few days back, Thett expressed some interest in the topic which I was preparing to debate. That topic was the "Animorphs" series by K.A. Applegate. So, I thought that perhaps Thett would like to debate this topic. I certainl...

Debating Period
19 Comments
Updated 2 Days Ago

Oppressive government is more desirable than no government.

inevitable_winner
jackh4mm3r

This is a "Lincoln-Douglas" debate; each opponent must have a value and criterion, followed by contentions. Round One is for acceptance and declaring which side you would like to debate: 'oppressive government' or 'no government.' Please excuse the side debate.org has declared I am; it would not let me proceed with the debate without picking a side. Round Two is for opening arguments only. Round Three is for rebuttals and strengthening your case. Next, Round 4 consists of more rebuttals. And fin...

Debating Period
1 Comments
Updated 4 Hours Ago

My Analysis On Riemann's Hypothesis > Your Analysis On Riemann's Hypothesis

Aerogant
J03ybatts

Rules: There is no "Acceptance Round". This is a philosophical debate, not a political debate, therefore in order to argue properly, you can only use analysis and a consensus; you cannot look for an answer, or make claims. Who ever can show best that they understand Riemann's Hypothesis, let alone solve it, will win this debate. Riemann's Hypothesis can be searched by you from any source, but you must research "Riemann's Hypothesis". First Analysis: "Considering that the Riemann's hy...

Debating Period
6 Comments
Updated 1 Day Ago

Madara Uchiha is too powerful

Truth_seeker
sewlohh

Madara Uchiha from Naruto is too powerful to beat First round acceptance...

Debating Period
2 Comments
Updated 2 Days Ago

Practising an organised religion is a hinderance to human intellect

realsinghshady
ricksterpr0

My argument is that practising an organised religion leads to a suppression/hinderance of human intellect. An easy definition of 'organised religion' : a set of formal rules and procedures derived from an ancient scripture (Bible, Qur'an, Veda's, Guru Granth Sahib, Torah etc.). I will take a pro position on this and challenge any arguments that rebut....

Debating Period
0 Comments
Updated 2 Days Ago

The God of Abraham Does Not Exist

AlternativeDavid
Thelastword

Rules: Round 1: Acceptance. Round 2/3/4: Arguments and rebuttals. Round 5: Closing statements. No new arguments/evidence. Failure to adhere to these rules results in a loss of conduct points. I argue that the God of Abraham (Islam, Judaism, and Christianity) is not real. I look forward to a good debate....

Debating Period
2 Comments
Updated 17 Hours Ago

should transgender panic defense hold up in court?

debater15
Thelastword

who wouldn't freak...

Debating Period
1 Comments
Updated 1 Day Ago

Evolution is scientifically proven

Truth_seeker
Theoretician101

I argue that evolution is factual First round acceptance...

Debating Period
15 Comments
Updated 1 Day Ago

Alcohols use as a socially acceptbale narcotic should be banned forthwith

iamanatheistandthisiswhy
Theunkown

In this debate I propose that alcohol should be banned as a socially acceptable narcotic. To elaborate, this means no more drinking wine, beer, vodka etc. I am not pushing for the termination of ethanol's use in research and medical related fields this is purely in the social sphere.Definitions:Narcotic:

Debating Period
7 Comments
Updated 2 Hours Ago