Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 61 - 70

Does God exist?

Toviyah
Envisage

Thanks Envisage for accepting this debate. First round for acceptance I'm pro, Envisage will be Con. BOP is on me. 'God' is the Deistic concept of God. (Creator, transcendent, powerful) Enjoy!...

Post Voting Period
195 Comments
Updated 3 Weeks Ago

Meta-Ethical Moral Relativism Is An Incoherent Position.

TheSkeptic
Cerebral_Narcissist

I thank Cerebral Narcissist for accepting this debate challenge - it's been a while since my last debate, so I've been eager for another one. My position in this debate is not only is meta-ethical moral relativism unsound, it's logically incoherent. From here on out, I will refer to this position as meta-ethical relativism, and to be more precisely it's abbreviated form MMR. The following is a definition of MMR[1]: "The truth or falsity of moral judgments, or their justification, is not...

Voting Period
194 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

All unadressed arguments in a debate should be considered concessions

Double_R
izbo10

Resolution As Pro my burden in this debate will be to defend the logic of the following statement: "You did not address his arguments, that means you concede them. That is...

Post Voting Period
194 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

Official Debate: Should the United States became a Commonwealth realm?

RoyalistTeaPartyOfficial
ChosenWolff

Hello, officially it's the Royalist Tea Party here, it has came to our attention that some people on this site were pretending to be us, for years, starting debates, discrediting us, etc., so we feel conflicted and must make an official debate. We apologise for any inconvenience. I, the real Emily Molloy, am having our vice chairman, Matthew, take control of this debate. F...

Voting Period
193 Comments
Updated 4 Weeks Ago

Does a God Exist?

qopel
BigSky

I am an Agnostic Atheist looking for a Theist to have an honest and fair debate about the existence of God. I'm not looking for a game of semantics. If you have the guts to take this debate, you must abide by the following: 1. No use of Wikipedia. You can't use Wikipedia on a college paper. I won't tolerate it here. 2. No vague definition of words. If you use a word that can have several meanings, make it clear what you actually mean. 3. No references to Creationist websites. Creationists ar...

Post Voting Period
193 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

Banning the death penelty.

italia4356
lvisman96

If we sentence a person to death then we are no better then the criminal and deserve to be punished our selves. We need to set an example for people. By letting the person live we show that we are above that persons current state of mind and stand by what we preach that taking a persons life is wrong....

Voting Period
192 Comments
Updated 6 Years Ago

Atheism vs. Christianity

DoubtingDave
Muted

Thank you muted for accepting this debate. Resolved: Atheism is more probable than Christianity.For purposes of this debate, we will be taking a literalistic approach to the Bible and will be using a Calvanistic doctrine of the Bible.If my opponent disagrees or would like to add any clarifications, please do so in round 1.Rules: (1) Debater must have typing experience and internet a...

Post Voting Period
190 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

Radiometric Dating is Accurate

RoyLatham
ThePipes

Radiometric dating is the method for establishing the age of objects by measuring the levels of radioisotopes in the sample. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiometric_dating One example is carbon dating. Carbon 14 is created by cosmic rays in the upper atmosphere. It decays to nitrogen 14 with a half life of 5730 years. C14 is continually being created and decaying, leading to an equilibrium state in the atmosphere. When the carbon dioxide, containing C14 as well as stable C12 and C13, is taken i...

Post Voting Period
189 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

Israel is on the short end of the stick

m93samman
juvanya

The full resolution of the debate is "Israel has clearly violated human rights and is unjustified in its actions." Juvanya has been adamant in upholding zionist doctrines and beliefs on facebook, and, after several days, he has refused to change his beliefs. No one is really judging the debates, though. Maybe here, the voting will provide for some sort of metric by which we determine who wins. _____ Rules: _____ 1) Round 1 will have no argumentation whatsoever; if my opponent has any al...

Post Voting Period
189 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

My opponent can neither disprove gravity nor an almighty God.

wjmelements
Ragnar_Rahl

"an almighty God" means just that. It is not specifically the God of Abraham, but can also mean a god not worshipped. The concept of an almighty God is what's being debated. "gravity" is the theoretical force that attracts mass together in our universe. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gravity (definition 3) "My opponent" means CON, also known as the contender. "can neither disprove...nor" means not being able to prove false either concept http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dispr...

Post Voting Period
187 Comments
Updated 5 Years Ago