If Logical-Master answers all of his opponent's questions, he probably won't contradict himself
Rules: 1. PRO must answer all of CON's questions. 2. If PRO contradicts himself, then PRO loses. Otherwise, PRO wins. 3. CON is only allowed to ask a maximum of ten questions in each round other than round 4. 4. Violation of the rules will result in an automatic loss in terms of the individual who violated any one of them. I reserve the right to dispute the contender's rendering of the topic should I feel it doesn't meet the ideas of what the debate is intended for. ....
I will not contradict myself.
Contradiction: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradiction Rules: 1. In Rounds 1-3, CON will ask PRO ten Yes/No questions. 2. In Rounds 2-4, PRO will answer all of CON's questions with Yes or No, or with an explanation as to why neither Yes nor No would be completely correct or appropriate. 3. In Rounds 2-4, CON can point out any contradictions that he or she believes to be present in PRO's answers. 4. When CON points out a contradiction, PRO may use all of the following rounds to defend t...
I will not contradict myself.
I will now try to defeat the diabolical wizard. Contradiction: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradiction Rules: 1. In Rounds 1-3, CON will ask PRO ten Yes/No questions. 2. In Rounds 2-4, PRO will answer all of CON's questions. 3. In Rounds 2-4, CON can point out any contradictions that he or she believes to be present in PRO's answers. 4. When CON points out a contradiction, PRO may use all of the following rounds to defend the accused contradiction until either CON drops the accusati...
wity fool is better than a foolish wit
what is the use of such wits when one becomes foolish at the time when they are actually needed On the other hand , a fool , who is deficient in judgement , sense or understanding deceives other person by his jest ....
This debate will not result in a tie
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, I am for the motion that this debate will not end in a tie. As a matter of fact, this debate will not end at all, assuming the the voting period is indefinite. Let us take an example. Say at a certain time there is a tie. However, the opposition is arguing that there will be a tie, so he is right. If he is right, then there is no tie. ARGUE THAT!!! thank you...
0.0(r)1=0.0
I will prove my point on a single contention. 1.If 0 repeats infinitely, 1 never occurs. Thus, 0.0(R)1=0.0...
There are no such things as needs
This one was inspired by my economics professor. He said there is nothing in the world that any one needs, only what they want. Example: I need that girl's number. (Actually, you just want it). Stronger example: I need air. (True, you need air to live, but....) Let the debating begin:...
The Egg came first, not the Chicken
The egg came first, details shall be displayed in round 2...
Semantical arguments are, in general, just.
I think that semantical arguments are just. Semantical - a type of argument in which the Contender of a debate uses the fact that either the Instigator used a resolution that was easily abusable or the Instigator failed to define the resolution so that the Contender could take the debate away from the framer's intent. Argument - "a reason given in proof or rebuttal" (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arguments) In general - "for the most part" (http://www.merriam-webster.com/diction...