Science Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 61 - 70

Animal Testing

AshleyAxline
lannan13

Animal testing is wrong and needs to be put to an end. It is only killing innocent animals while getting us nowhere in finding cures and vaccines. You're ignorant if you think otherwise. "Humans are the only hunters that kill when they aren't hungry."...

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 5 Months Ago

The land environment restricts human life and is irrelevant

olsyboy
OreosAreCool

I am arguing that the land environment restricts human life and is irrelevant. By land environment, I suggest the environment based on land (ie. trees and farmland). It is a waste of space- space which could be used to create more services for the general population. Dwellings are made much smaller to accommodate for wildlife, and it is frustrating to know that we are all missing out on so much. Pollution is not extremely bad. It is an indicator of technological advancements. When we make...

Post Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Noah's flood, as described in Genesis, was a real historical event.

creationtruth
ThinkBig

Greetings!Was the global flood described in Genesis a truly historical event? Is there scientific evidence which lends credibility to this terrifying deluge? As a biblical creationist and student of science, I assert that such evidence indeed exists and even goes beyond lending credibility; evidence exists which demonstra...

Post Voting Period
18 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Scientific evidence does not support Evolution

Cook123
NumingDisasterAnon

I will be arguing that that evolution has not been proven scientifically and any evidence used to support it could be reasonably explained from a creation viewpoint. Since the theory of evolution is taught in schools as science, and creation is presented as religious, the burden of proof is on con to show that evolution can and did happen. Science - Knowledge gained from observation, experimentation, and demonstration (Can be proven). Evidence - The available body of facts or information ind...

Post Voting Period
25 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

Young Earth Creationism Is Not Possible

Subutai
Pennington

I hope you like the definitions chosen, and please agree to them before accepting the debate. Full Resolution Young earth creationism is possible. BoP is shared. Definitions Young Earth Creationism: "...the religious belief that the Universe, Earth and all life on Earth were created by direct acts of the Abrahamic God during a relatively short period, sometime between 5,700 and 10,000 years ago."[...

Post Voting Period
100 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

The Universe (time, space, matter) has always existed - no beginning.

Channe
Sunfire315

There is no solid evidence that the Universe as we know it truly had a beginning. And it makes sense for it to be eternal. Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. This means it had no beginning. I assert that this is true for the elemental properties of the Universe - including space, time, matter, and energy (STME). While we may be one of many versions of the Universes that has expanded and contracted, I find it more logical that at a base level STME has always existed. The argument of...

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 11 Months Ago

logic is cause and effect

vi_spex
Jjjohn

cause=random+specified sum of all logic=chaos+order chaos=random cause+effect order=specified cause(intent)+effect poison=unhealthy logical=dont drink poisonous things to stay healthy illogical=drink poisonous things to stay healthy logic is true, logic is absolute, reality is logic...

Post Voting Period
16 Comments
Updated 5 Months Ago

Given the available data, denying the theory of evolution is completely unreasonable

Burncastle
daley

This debate should be impossible to accept, comment if you want to debate. Some clarifications: - I will have most (if not all) of the BoP, but my opponent should feel free to present any arguments he/she deems useful, either against evolution or in favor of an alternate theory. - The first round is for acceptance and I would like my opponent to present his/her position very quickly. - My first argument will be mostly copy pasted from one of my earlier debate, so don't be surprised...

Post Voting Period
142 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

Are Bigfoots actually Wookies?

Shrekoning
Father_Dagon

The first round is for acceptance....

Post Voting Period
4 Comments
Updated 5 Months Ago

Are Penguins Ducks?

IshanKohli
Zarium

Penguins are indeed ducks. Such surety of the matter comes with the support of the very definition of a duck: "A waterbird with a broad blunt bill, short legs, webbed feet, and a waddling gait." This definition from "Science and Society: Understanding Scientific Methodology, Energy, Climate, and Sustainability" by Eric S. Swanson states the very characteristics that define what a duck is. Looking at the common attributes of penguins, it is evident that penguins have the very same attributes that...

Post Voting Period
16 Comments
Updated 6 Months Ago