Science Debates

Sort By:
Showing: 61 - 70

Abiogenesis is a reasonable theory for the beginnings of life


So I want to be clear on several things off the bat so that whoever joins this debate understands the line I'm drawing here and what this debate is going to be about. This is not a debate on evolution. This is not a debate on the Big Bang theory. I would be happy to argue these in future debates, especially evolution, but there is a distinct line of separation here. The argument will be specific to abiogenesis, and it is my burden to present a reasonable theory and defend it. As such, I w...

Post Voting Period
Updated 7 Months Ago

Information science demonstrates that biological information requires an intelligent mind (i.e. God)


The information science, and definition of information that will be the resolution for this debate is to be found on this webpage: You can disagree with the information laws, but we must agree on the definition for information. If you do not agree with Dr. Gitt's definition of information (statistics, syntax, semantics, pragmatics and apobetics), then please do not accept this challenge, but you may state why you don't agree in the comment section....

Post Voting Period
Updated 2 Months Ago

Is the Bible right when it says not to have sex outside of marriage & only between a man & a woman?


1 Corinthians 6:18 (New International Version 2011) 1Co 6:18 Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a person commits are outside the body, but whoever sins sexually, sins against their own body. Mark 10:6-9 (New International Version 2011) Mk 10:6 "But at the beginning of creation God "made them male and female." Mk 10:7 "For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, Mk 10:8 and the two will become one flesh." So they are no longer two, but on...

Voting Period
Updated 1 Month Ago

The Big Bang Theory Is True


I'm doing this for a lot of reasons - Commitment, learning, and most importantly, the weekly stupid. The Big Bang Theory - "A cosmological theory holding that the universe originated approximately 20 billion years ago from the violent explosion of a very small agglomeration of matter of extremely high density and temperature."[1] First round for acceptance, and please don't forfeit. Sources [1]:

Post Voting Period
Updated 1 Year Ago

The chicken came before the egg


The chicken came before the egg it has been showed that the chicken came before the egg. I will state my argument next round but my opponent goes...

Post Voting Period
Updated 6 Months Ago

Science proves God's existance


"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." -Albert Einstein Evolution, the Big Bang, and other theories are clearly disproven by themselves. For anything like these to originate, it would require a power that we humans cannot comprehend. Evolution claims that every creature on the planet evolved from a similar ancestor, but where could it have started? The dirt, perhaps? How could you create life from an inanimate object without a being such as God? The simple an...

Post Voting Period
Updated 3 Months Ago

The Big Bang Theory


I believe there is countless facts to support the big bang theory. Rules Round 1: acceptance. Round 2: Opening. Round 3: Argument. Round 4: Rebuttal. Round 5: closing argument any other closing comments. This is my first Debate on here so I am just trying to further my understanding of debate and hopefully gain some experience...

Post Voting Period
Updated 3 Months Ago

Evolution Is Not Proven


"Evolution" is defined, for the purposes of this debate, as "the idea that all extant life descended from a common organism via mutations and Natural Selection."First round is acceptance only. Neither I nor my opponent may not use the comment section while the debate is in progress, which is from the time my opponent accepts the debate until the voting period begins....

Post Voting Period
Updated 6 Months Ago

Naturalistic evolutionism cannot be rationally affirmed


Hey everyone 1st round is for acceptance. "naturalistic evolutionism" is the view that evolution is the process by which all life, including homo sapiens, arose, via natural processes and without the intervention of the divine, supernatural, or guiding intelligence. The Burden of proof is shared; I have to show that naturalistic evolution cannot be rationally affirmed, and Con has to show that naturalistic evolution can be rationally affirmed. Good luck and God Bless...

Post Voting Period
Updated 1 Month Ago

It is logical to assume there are parallel universes


Please note: I have made this debate impossible to accept. Inquire in the comments if you wish to debate this topic.PRO is arguing that it is logical to assume there are parallel universes. CON is refuting their arguments.This debate is not relying on evidence; it is not PRO's job to provide evidence of parallel universes but to show how they are logical.BoP is on PRO. Definitions LOGICAL - Goes along with logic, NOT relying on evidence ASSUME - Use...

Post Voting Period
Updated 1 Year Ago