A debate on a certain controversy

Okay, the exact resolution is "Patrick_Henry is being childish and counterproductive in his actions against a certain group on debate.org" This group is of course the so-called "voting block" that actually isn't a voting block. The debate in which he does this is here:http://www.debate.org/debate/5454/ Don't forget to look at the comments. He commits libel, and calls this group a voting block, and its members "A literal band of teenagers, foolishly set in the political views without any l...
The upcoming Debate.org forum should start with no more than 5 boards.


In the past I have tried to join multiple forums, only to stop posting in them because of lack of activity. The Debate.org forum has a lot of potential to be moderately active, but they can mess things up by having too many boards. As I type this there are 13 users online. That's usually around the peak, and shows that we don't have a large user base to mess around with. If the forum were to be split into more than 5 boards, I'll list my ideas for specific boards in another round, the post...
Are electric cars good?


Social Networking


Resolved: That, on balance, social networking Web sites have a positive impact on the United States. Today, I am against the resolution, Resolved: That, on balance, social networking Web sites have a positive impact on the United States. Social networking sites have had a negative impact on the United States. My first conjunctions is as followed; --Social Networking is potentially going to harm to persons using them. One example of this is Megan Meier, who took her life after an old friend...
Debate.org should not have to confirm people's identity with phone.


Debate.org requires people to use a mobile phone to confirm their identity. 1. Debate.org already confirms using email. 2. Some people do not have a mobile phone, so therefore you are limiting the right to vote to only those who have mobile phones? I am not allowed to vote because I do not have a mobile phone. How fair is that?...
Teenagers Should Have Unlimited Access to Computers and The Internet


My view is that teenagers (13+) should have unlimited, but monitored access to the internet. By monitored, I mean that parents can view activity for anything dangerous/illegal, but beside from that, they are allowed to freely browse. I will let my opponent begin the debate....
P.C.'s Are Better Than Macs


My argument is that P.C.'s are better than Macs. Definitions: Macs: computers manufactured by Apple Computers P.C.'s: Computers not manufactured by Apple Computers...
http vs https. https is better
I am debating to support https.We need to secure all the websites.So https is better.http is very insecure....
By 2040, the FG should mandate that all new passenger vehicles sold in US be powered by alt fuels

I will let my opponent have the first agument and I hope they will let me have the last agument in round 4....
Hacking should not be a federal offence

Hacking? Who has hacked or wanted to learn to hack? Is it a crime? What really is a "hacker" Technically, a hacker is someone who is enthusiastic about computer programming. But what about "crackers" Crackers are people who try to gain unauthorized access to computers. This is normally done through the use of a 'backdoor' program installed on your machine. A lot of crackers also try to gain access to resources through the use of password cracking software, which tries billions of passwords to fi...