Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 61 - 70

God Exists

PanduOfficial
GeminiContractor

Hey!I would just like to tell you that this round is not used for debating but is for validating that you will accept the challenge in the debate! I am saying that God exists! You will be debating and trying to prove why God doesn't exist Good Luck :) ...

Voting Period
22 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

The Internet does more harm than good. Do you agree?

Hasya14
Rusydi23

I agree with the statement. Not only it brings a positive matter to the user but it also brings more harm. As we get addicted to the Internet, we will forget what"s happening around us. As this happens frequently, more and more people will get affected therefore such cases will happen again and again if they don"t realize what the proper way of using Internet is....

Voting Period
7 Comments
Updated 3 Days Ago

tobacco should be heavily taxed to reimburse for government health care costs

dairygirl4u2c
jackh4mm3r

the idea, that cancer and other bad health effects from smoking causes an increase in health care costs, in a country that is heavily subsidized by the government. so, whatever it costs should be made up for in cigarette taxes. my understanding is right now the costs of tobacco to the government are not sufficiently made up for in sales taxes. if it were, it would be more prohibitive for smokers, so they would't smoke as much, and it'd be ensure the government is getting reimbursed for what...

Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 3 Days Ago

Does God Exist?

Seeksecularism
Toviyah

First round is for acceptance. Second round is for opening statements Third round for first rebuttals Fourth round for second rebuttals and concluding remarks Pro will support the affirmative that God does exist. God will be define as the omnipotent, omnscience, and omnibenevolent creator and sustainer of the Universe as traditionally described by three monotheisms: Christianity, Judism, and Islam....

Voting Period
10 Comments
Updated 3 Days Ago

Gay marriage should be legal

HailedPanic913
rings48

Give me a good reason why it is bad. People deserve marriage just as much as anyone else. How would it feel if gays decided weather heterosexual marriage is illegal or not. How would it feel?...

Voting Period
12 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

Sneaking Snacks into the Movie theater

HailedPanic913
Zarroette

Prices are ridiculous get the same thing at the store next door for a way cheaper price when at the theater you pay 2x more....

Voting Period
3 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

the 'unlimited paradox' - the unlimited as an idea is proven to be a false

dairygirl4u2c
Paradigm

the 'unlimited paradox' - the unlimited is proven to be a false idea weakest point. the unlimited paradox states that an immovable object cannot exist at the same time as an unstoppable force. the fact that it cannot exist at the same time, shows that the unlimited truly doesn't exist. better point. an immovable rock cannot be created that can be lifted by an unstoppable force....

Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

Objectivism is a valid ethical system.

bossyburrito
Wocambs

DEFINITIONS:Objectivism: The philosophy of author Ayn Rand, and mainly, for this debate, the idea that all individuals should act in their own rational self-interests. Valid: True, or, in other words, pertaining to the facts of reality. Ethics: The study of how any given individual (or group) should act in life. This debate will focus on the ethical claims made by Objectivism, as...

Voting Period
26 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

Men are Discriminated Against in the United States

CordialCongressman
Atheist-Independent

In this debate, I (pro) will argue that men face greater social and legal discrimination in the United States than women. The burden of proof will rest on the pro (myself). I ask that debate on this issue be civil. The first round will be for introductions only, the second round will be only for opening arguments (no rebuttals), and the third and fourth rounds will be a rebuttals and closings, respectively. No new argument may be posted in the third round unless it is to rebut a prior argumen...

Voting Period
17 Comments
Updated 4 Days Ago

Pascal's Wager is not a convincing reason to believe in the Judeo-Christian God.

TruthHurts
Truth_seeker

I will be arguing that Pascal's Wager is not a convincing reason to believe in the Judeo-Christian God. I will be discussing the calculus involved with the wager, characterizations of the Judeo-Christian God, and results of belief based upon the wager. Pascal's Wager, for this round, shall be characterized as the argument that because belief in God holds infinitely good consequences (i.e. Heaven), and disbelief has very bad consequences (i.e. Hell), you should believe in Go...

Voting Period
7 Comments
Updated 4 Days Ago