Technology Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 61 - 70

Gun and Bullet are better than Bow and Arrow.

VenomousNinja
Randomknowledge

This is just a fun argument, based on total opinion. Please, remember, this is all in good fun. The bow and arrow combination is more resourceful, stealthier, and cheaper than the gun and bullet combination. People have used the bow and arrow for years, and are still using it today. It is good for hunting and battle, mainly because of the reasons stated above....

Voting Period
3 Comments
Updated 6 Years Ago

windows xp pro or windows xp home?

george23
kenicks

just a question which is better but i like pro if it got more item i like pro cause it might got more items but which one!??!?!??!?!??!?!...

Voting Period
3 Comments
Updated 6 Years Ago

I believe some people on this website are incompetent in making propositions.

DucoNihilum
Darth_Grievous_42

I hold the belief that many people on this website simply do horribly when creating their propositions. Some of them are worded in such a way that they are not propositions, some of them are worded in such a way that the topic is confusing....

Voting Period
10 Comments
Updated 6 Years Ago

THBT: modern technology does more harm than good

jemual
Patrick_Henry

First and foremost I would like to define some terms that I would be including in this debate proper What is modern technology? Technology is a systematic knowledge and action, usually of industrial processes but applicable to any recurrent activity. Technology is closely related to science and to engineering. Science deals with humans' understanding of the real world about them—the inherent properties of space, matter, energy, and their interactions. Engineering is the application of obje...

Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 6 Years Ago

Nintendo is awesome!

massvideogamer
bigbass3000

Nintendo is an awesome system. The games are really good, and the graphics are pretty good (not great like the 360 and PS3, but still good) I will leave my opening statement to that an see what my opponent has to say against Nintendo...

Voting Period
4 Comments
Updated 6 Years Ago

Who had it better? Us or the cavemen?

Sloan
Miserlou

I do not believe that technology has changed the world for the better. I mean look back at the times when the cavemen were still around. They worked maybe 20 hours a week to provide food and the "work" was hunting. People these days now take time off work just to go hunting. They had a lot less to worry about too. Such as identity theft, credit card scam, pretty much anything financial....

Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 6 Years Ago

Blind people should be allowed to drive cars just like everyone else.

solo
MoonDragon613

I think allowing blind people to drive cars on the road without the ability to see is wreckless and should never be allowed. Blind folks can wait until technology develops to the point where cars can drive themselves, if they do not want to walk themselves to places they want to go....

Voting Period
12 Comments
Updated 6 Years Ago

The Burden of Proof should be Optional, not Necessary

Darth_Grievous_42
Kleptin

After reading many debates, it seems that the words "burden of proof" comes up a lot. I do not think it is fair that someone should HAVE to back their evidence up, but rather it should be optional. Evidence, of course, adds to any debate. If someone wants to give a good argument on why "Nazi's were good people", they should probably have a good amount a proof as to why they can say something that goes completely against the common grain. There is a staggering amount of evidence to say that they...

Voting Period
5 Comments
Updated 6 Years Ago

Is Logical Master a person, or machine? I say A.I all the way!

eyeleapy
ShrimPman

I say Logical Master is nothing but a pile of screws and bolts. If you have not noticed him/it in other debates, it clearly shows you its expression to act as a machine would act. He is no he but an it, which get very angry, "If machines can feel anger" when you tell it, it makes no sense on debates, what-so-ever....

Voting Period
10 Comments
Updated 6 Years Ago

It is noble to believe in God without requiring proof of his existence.

HandsOff
ComradeJon1

Why are so many religious people so bent on trying to prove there is a god? Believers are sacrificing nothing if they have to secure proof of God before they are willing to believe. If one believes he has solid proof of God's existence, he has avoided suspending his reasoning in order to believe. He is therefore taking no risk, no leap of faith, and is making no intellectual sacrifice whatsoever. Regardless of whether he is correct, he is nestled in the comfort of his logic. Why is that nobl...

Voting Period
5 Comments
Updated 6 Years Ago