Philosophy Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 71 - 80

Women Should not be Considered for Front Line Combat Roles, and Additionally Excluded From the Draft

RC-9282
Capitalistslave

Open challenge to debate the above topic. I will be taking the pro stance, opponent will be delegated as con. Rules are as follows: - Four rounds - 72 Hours - 10k Characters - One week voting period - Comments are allowed - No trolling - No profanity - If the above two are broken, forfeit is forced FIRST ROUND ACCEPTANCE ONLY...

Post Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 5 Months Ago

Is it morally required for one to help others when their lives are at risk?

LIFEISNEVEREASY
Ryugen

As the pro side, I argue that it is morally required for one to help another in certain ways when that person is in serious danger. Both not acting and not requiring one to act in a certain way when they see another being in serious danger are morally unacceptable. Rules for this debate: 1. This debate shall only focus on this specific topic. 2. This topic shall be argued in a polite and logical manner. 3. Round 1 is for opening statements. 4. Round 2 & 3 is for arguments 5. Round 4 is...

Debating Period
0 Comments
Updated 5 Months Ago

Policing, law enforcement, or security services provided by government is immoral

tommylibertarian1
EXOPrimal

R1: Acceptance R2: Argument R3: Rebuttal R4: Closing Remarks(only limited new argument if absolutely necessary) I am taking that position that modern policing that is, all protection, security and law enforcement currently provided by governments is immoral. I will try to argue generally but my frame of reference is the United States....

Debating Period
8 Comments
Updated 7 Months Ago

Is Santa Claus Good for Children?

cloebowie
VyridosVhasselion

This debate is whether Santa Claus is good for children or not. I can tell you why he's not, and you can tell me why he is. Santa Claus is a bribe. Children are no nicer because of him. The children on his "nice list" are just as fake as he is. Make the best debater win....

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 7 Months Ago

could An Anarchist/ Communist revolution happen in the U.S.A and be successful?

Avelvetnightmare
DefenderofBacon

This debate is asking if a Radical left wing ideology (Such as Anarchism or Communism) could start a revolution in America and Succeed. Such as, have it Successfully overthrow the government. I will take the pro side. Here are there reasons why: 1. De-Pacified Populace One the General populace turns off their TV's, puts down their iPhones, and stops listening to CNN and FOX, they will realize how much suffering there is in the world, because of America, and because of Capitalism. If pe...

Debating Period
8 Comments
Updated 5 Months Ago

Abortion is always Morally Permissible

bsh1
Envisage

PrefaceI have recently been having some philosophical and logical consistency issues with my Pro-Choice stance. I would therefore like to defend a Pro-Life position to help me understand that persepective, and to determine which point of view I find more compelling.To accept this debate, you must have completed 4 debates already. To vote you must have a minimum of 3,000 ELO. Because this is such a contentious issue, I would also like to remind voters...

Post Voting Period
137 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

Theism offers a more likely context than atheism for affirming moral realism.

popculturepooka
Sargon

I thank Sargon agreeing to debate me on this topic. I shall be arguing that given moral realism theism is more likely than atheism. Or that theism makes "more sense" of moral realism than atheism does. My job is to argue that, yes, theism offer a more likely context in which to affirm moral realism and Con's job is to argue that, to the contrary, atheism offers a more likely context than theism in which to affirm moral realism. In short, this will be a mostly meta-ethical debate. [1]<...

Post Voting Period
122 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

The Kalam Cosmological Argument

sengejuri
illegalcombat

Full Premise: The Kalam Cosmological Argument is sound. "Sound" is defined as "a logically valid argument that withstands all scrutiny." Simply put - if Con can present evidence or argument that successfully dismantles the Kalam, Con wins. Format: Round 1 - Acceptance and definitions Round 2 - Opening Arguments (no rebuttals) Round 3 - Rebuttals/Counter Arguments Round 4 - Final rebuttals (no new arguments) Con may begin their rebuttal immediately of the following argument...

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 10 Months Ago

The Problem of Evil falsifies the Christian God's Omnibenevolence

Envisage
Wylted

I am honoured to have Wylted accept this debate! Best of luck to him!.The burden of proof is on me to demonstrate the resolution to be true. I will argue in the following round and Con may provide rebuttals/arguments in the same round.10,000 characters.Round 1: AcceptanceRound 2: Opening arguments, Con may rebut meRound 3: Rebuttals/ArgumentsRound 4: Rebuttals/Conclusions - No new arguments/brand new rebuttalsThat is all, good luck!!...

Post Voting Period
240 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

Is it obvious that a creator exist?

Vinnie_Cross_Briet
Logiq

IntroDefinition creator: creator, meaning an intelligent mind that thinks and creates, an actual personal entity. Anyone is free to accept this debate, regardless of you being new or a veteran. I will start with two out of several arguments I have for the existence of a creator, will elaborate a bit on them but will also try keep it as short as possible. Whether God exists or not, is not really a scientific question. You´re not going to prove h...

Debating Period
16 Comments
Updated 5 Months Ago