I broke out of jail, should i be put back?
I don't think so because I spent a lot of time trying to break out. So since I put in all that effort I shouldn't have to go back....
The Bible is true, the Book of Mormon is not.
Terms: I am a Christian looking to debate a Mormon. If you are not a Mormon, this debate is not for you. The Bible has withstood the test of time. It is accurate in areas of History, Geology, Logic, Prophecy and Science. The Bible literally warns against Mormonism. A Christian who follows the Bible will not be able to then also follow the Book of Mormon, because they are in conflict with one and other. First round, accept challenge and introduce yourself. Second round make the case for you...
S.O.S classes are a waste of time
We don't need to know about the past, because its the past. We only think about the future. What ever was done in the past to those people, it was done We don't Care!!...
High-speed rail should receive federal government subsidy in-place of current subsidies on highways
My belief is that federal government subsidies on high-speed rail would benefit the United States greater than the continual subsidy of the current highway system. The first round is acceptance, the second is stating your argument, third round attempt to dispute claims made by the opponent in second round. I lowered the max number of characters to keep arguments concise. I look forward to a good debate, good luck....
To hold the idea of zero as not sufficient in-itself to be called a number is immoral.
By the definition, every member of the domain of 0 IS a member of the posterity of the 1st term; hence the successor of a member of the domain of 0 must be a member of the posterity of the first term (because the posterity of a term always contains its own successors, by the general definition of posterity), and therefore a member of the domain of 0, because by the definition of posterity of the first term is the same as the domain. All numbers do not have the same successor....
Neutral agnosticism versus ALL beliefs regarding God!
My opponent can define anything except neutral agnosticism.If you disagree with my definition. do not try to debate it in comments. Do not try to ppose it in round 1. Just do not accept the debate.Neutral agnosticism: The theory that no degree of certainty, especially regarding God, can be achieved without physical evidence.Thank you to my opponent. You shall debate all beliefs other than neutral agnosticism. That is end of it all. Do the hulahoop!!!!!!!!...
Resolved: US legislation banning flag burning is unjust.
This round is for acceptance only....
Death Penalty should be abolished
Abolished: Taken away, removed, something that has been disposed of.Death Penalty: The decision of another human being(s) for another human being to die.I thank my opponent in advance for accepting this debate and I hope that he will enjoy this debate. This is debate is on whether death penalty should be abolished or not.My position states that I am "for Death Penalty being abolished." My opponent is "ag...
I welcome Britain's position on the sideline of Europe
I would like to propose that I welcome Britain's position on the sideline's of Europe. it is not a question of if it is on the sideline's or not but whether one welcomes it or not! I look forward to a lively & exciting debate!...
Christianity is so much crappier than budhiaisaim
whatcha got ya frenchie vote for me for bacon and strippers...