Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 81 - 90

Abortion is morally wrong.

el_ginger
SocialistAtheistNutjob

I believe that abortion is morally wrong if you are an evolutionist or a christian. Round 1: Acceptance and opening statement Round 2: Opening arguements/rebuttles Round 3: Rebuttles Round 4: Arguements and rebuttles Round 5: Rebuttles and closing statements I look forward to a civilized debate :)...

Voting Period
8 Comments
Updated 2 Days Ago

The Christian God As Described In the Bible Does Not Exist

AlternativeDavid
telisw37

Rules Round 1: No arguments. Just acceptance. Round 2/3: Arguments and rebuttals Round 4: Closing statements. No new arguments No "god of the gaps" arguments allowed. Any violation of the rules results in conduct points going to the other debater. Mutual violation results in a tie for conduct. Definitions: God of the gaps: If science can't explain it, god did it. Exist: To be real I look forward to a good debate. If you cannot accept it, it is because you have not complet...

Voting Period
12 Comments
Updated 2 Days Ago

It Is Not Possible For An Atheist To Win in Pascal's Wager

LifeMeansGodIsGood
Robert_Weiler

Rules: (I like fair rules) For this debate, "atheist" is defined as a person who believes there is no God.My opponent agrees to accept this definition without broadening the definition and without questioning the definition. The agreed upon definition of "atheism" for this debate is the intellectual and/or religious belief system which concludes that there is no God. My opponent agrees to accept this definition without broadening the definition and without ques...

Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 2 Days Ago

The Christian God exists (11)

superbowl9
LifeMeansGodIsGood

This is a debate about whether or not the Christian god exists. I will be refuting arguments from my opponent, who will have the burden of proving that the Christian god is real. The Christian god is the god as described by Jesus and the Bible. Rounds 1-4 are all for claims, rebuttals, and counter-rebuttals. Since I would not be able to refute my opponent's fourth-round claims, I request that they write "no round" in the fourth round of the debate. You can use any type of evidence, o...

Voting Period
12 Comments
Updated 2 Days Ago

People over-exaggerate jumping dogs

Equalityman
Aerogant

This is my first argument on here so not that experienced at arguments yet. Help me get better with arguments please! Dogs are lovely companions who show a lot of companionship. They are living beings who strive to please. There are behaviors that are cute. When dogs see friends/ people coming through their homes, at parks, dogs get excited run and jump. When I turn away from a dog who is jumping it stresses me out and feel like a jerk. When I let dogs jump on me I feel happy. I find it easy...

Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 2 Days Ago

Evil is a lack of good

SmallTacos
Aerogant

Hello, and welcome to my debate. I am taking the position of Pro, you of Con if you choose to accept. Please be chivalrous, do not swear, and use no logical fallacies. Godwin's law shall not be invoked. Without further ado, let us begin. I argue that evil is a lack of good. Here is why: for years, people have associated evil with cold and blackness, emptyness, all quite entropic. It is almost as if they knew that good exists but evil does not. For example, in the bible Jesus tells us that...

Voting Period
4 Comments
Updated 2 Days Ago

Should the nordic unite to one country?

RantBoss
HistoryBuff

Do you think the nordic/scandinavia unite to one country, the nordic federation? A country existing of the regions, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Denmark, "land Islands, Faraoe islands and Lappland. The country would have the 10th best economy in the world, with a population of just 25 million. Every single country in the nordic region has a similar culture and they get along so well they could easily unite. The major languages would be Scandinavian and Finnish, as the scandinavian languages a...

Voting Period
5 Comments
Updated 2 Days Ago

Objective morality would prove naturalism to be false

Benshapiro
Aerogant

First round is for acceptance. No new arguments in the final round but rebuttals are permitted. Naturalism: "a philosophical viewpoint according to which everything arises from natural properties and causes, and supernatural or spiritual explanations are excluded or discounted."Objective: "(of a person or their judgment) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representin...

Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 2 Days Ago

Extracurricular activities are necessary in schools

vidhupv
dsjpk5

This house strongly beleives that Extrra curricular Activities are necessary in schools.We study for hours at a stretch with a recess or two.We really require refreshing hours like Physical Education....

Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 2 Days Ago

Intelligent design is a more likely cause than Abiogenesis for the origin of life

Jellon
Aerogant

Abiogenesis is the natural process of life arising from non-living matter such as simple organic compounds. Pro must show that the most likely origin for the first life on earth to be an intelligent source. Con must show that the most likely origin for the first life on earth to be a non-intelligent source. Round 1 will be acceptance. Round 2 will be opening arguments. Round 3 will be rebuttals to opening arguments. Round 4 will be rebuttals to round 3 rebuttals. Round 5 will be for any c...

Voting Period
26 Comments
Updated 2 Days Ago