Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 11 - 20

Relativism is a Logically Flawed Philosophy

Bishop1889
Capitalistslave

I wish to argue for the position that Relativism is a flawed philosophical concept, and will be defending and promoting Absolutism throughout my arguments. Arguments should be made in point form with supporting evidence written below, for the first round positions will be stated in point form only, further arguments will follow in rounds 2-3. Ad Hominem arguments will be tolerated. The opponent will construct their thesis in the first round, then resort to rebuttals and further arguments in the...

Post Voting Period
3 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

Everything is a result of chance and there is a robust illusion that God exists.

AllUnpowerful
HepEbolAids

The topic of this debate is that simultaneously everything is a direct result of random chance and there is a robust illusion that God exists. I will be arguing against the topic. Everyone please remember to keep calm and carry on... and to be polite. If everything is a direct result of random chance, for every detail of an illusion, it is a direct result of random chance that that detail doesn't destroy or prevent the illusion. The complexity of the illusion considered, the illusion wouldn't...

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

Anything is a hypothetical possibility

AllUnpowerful
X1

I will try to prove that everything is a hypothetical possibility. For something to cease to be a possibility, every hypothetical statement that concludes its truth must be proved false. However, there are infinite hypothetical statements that conclude the truth of anything. If this is even a possibility, then it is possible that anything is possible. If it is possible that anything is possible, anything is possible. Therefore, anything is possible. You can paste and run the Python 3 co...

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

Rap Battle!

madness
Spiritpaw

Round 1 acceptance only. Round 2 and 3 RAP! Dis me/rap about how great you are. Whatever you want. Whatever you think will make a good rap. The only thing voters need to vote on, is rap quality. Which will be "most convincing argument." Spelling/grammar doesn't matter, neither do sources. Let's take a break from serious debates and have some fun....

Post Voting Period
11 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

The sun has already exploded

GOP_lol
Dirty-Morgs

We are all about to die. This is because the sun is currently exploding at a really slow pace.Bleh ...

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

Should Debate.org require three debates just to comment and vote?

DrKaboom44
Barennora

Surely not! I understand that its to make sure they have accounts that are active, but coming up with debates that I have a good enough opinion on is hard. My first debate I just wanted to see what people would say. I want to be able to vote without cluttering Debate.org with debates like these....

Post Voting Period
10 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

The U.S. should return to a gold standard

RonPaulConservative
whiteflame

Google Docs are not a violation of conduct, the charactar limit is 10,000....

Post Voting Period
41 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

Books are Better than Movies

westerly2004
Nanubot

This is a challenge to all those who think movies are better than books! Round 1: acceptance Round 2-3: rebuttal of opponent and arguments Round 4: rebuttal; no new arguments...

Post Voting Period
4 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

The United States is a Christian Nation

APHDebator
zeromeansnothing

The United States: is it a Christian nation? I would like to believe that this is not the case, and historically, there is a vast vein of evidence that proves that the United States was, from the very beginning founded on Secular beliefs. Sorry for re-doing this debate, trolls who accept the debate, make one/no argument and then fail to respond irritate my debating experiences. Please only accept if you will make it through all 4 rounds. Round 1 is acceptance/laying down what Pro will prov...

Post Voting Period
5 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

Anthropogenic climate change.

Stupidape
Chang29

I will contend that anthropegenic climate change exists. The contender will contend that anthropegenic climate change is non-existent. StructureR1 Acceptance & definitionsR2 ArgumentsR3 RebuttalsR4 DefenseBurden of proof Burden of proof will be shared equally. This is because I am making the affrimative claim and the instiagator, yet am arguing for what is normally accepted in the scientific co...

Post Voting Period
5 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago