The Instigator
AndreaW
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
19debater19
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points

A Bill to Limit the Quantity of Calories to Fast Food Restaurants

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
AndreaW
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/16/2013 Category: Health
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 632 times Debate No: 40678
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

AndreaW

Con

The US will limit the quanity of calories that fast food restaurants can encompass in their meal options to fit within the average recommended nutrition plan.
It may be that the amount of calories fast food restaurants have in their food is not healthy for us. And I do admit that limiting how much calories fast food restaurants have in their food would be a good thing for our health. But most people nowadays really don't care about that. They just wanna eat what tastes good. The problem with our society now is most people don't take the time to sit down at their house with their family every night and have a good healthy meal. Today our thought of a good meal is sitting down at McDonalds and grubbing on a 550 calorie Big Mac with French fries that has up to 500 calories. We love the taste of tasty burgers and salty potato fries. That's just how it is now. I really don't think that's going to change anytime soon.
19debater19

Pro

...Are you a fat f*cker who is protesting that you dont get to eat deep fried chicken?
Debate Round No. 1
AndreaW

Con

I'm actually not a fat f*cker. I happen to be skinny for your information. I'm just sayin that not everybody has time to sit at home and eat a good healthy meal that could take up to 15 minutes to eat when eating at McDonalds could take about 5 minutes and then your out. Lowering the calories would just be stupid and unneccesary.
19debater19

Pro

19debater19 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
AndreaW

Con

AndreaW forfeited this round.
19debater19

Pro

...Giggity
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by SONOFGOD2013 3 years ago
SONOFGOD2013
Hurry up and post your rap!!!!
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by TetsuRiken 3 years ago
TetsuRiken
AndreaW19debater19Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had better augment but pro said Giggity which is funny