A Flat Tax is a good idea.
Vote Here
The voting period for this debate does not end.
| Started: | 12/26/2007 | Category: | Miscellaneous |
| Updated: | 5 years ago | Status: | Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 1,382 times | Debate No: | 1022 |
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (7)
Votes (22)
|
The flat tax is a good idea. It would charge everyone the same amount. Some say a flat tax favors the wealthy because they pay a higher percentage. Some say a flat tax favors the poor because it simplifies the system and thus makes budgeting easier.
Well let me start out by saying you have already made my main argument for me 1. Flat Tax helps the rich more than people who could actually use it. 2. While it does simplify the system that does not matter because it will be abused by the rich and our current government 3. The non-rich who this should benefit, those living below the poverty line that is, will not be helped more with this system than with the current tax system. |
![]() |
22 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by 1gambittheman1 3 years ago
| bsergent | AdamCW12 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Vote Placed by mrmazoo 5 years ago
| bsergent | AdamCW12 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by rockeywood 5 years ago
| bsergent | AdamCW12 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Vote Placed by mrqwerty 5 years ago
| bsergent | AdamCW12 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by MarxistKid 5 years ago
| bsergent | AdamCW12 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by Johnicle 5 years ago
| bsergent | AdamCW12 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by mrmatt505 5 years ago
| bsergent | AdamCW12 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Vote Placed by tarsjake 5 years ago
| bsergent | AdamCW12 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by bsergent 5 years ago
| bsergent | AdamCW12 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Vote Placed by sagarous 5 years ago
| bsergent | AdamCW12 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |










GKH is right, WHy should a more successful person have to pay the bills of those who arent as successful. the current progressive tax is an infringment on the wonderful thing that we know as capitalism. equal taxation is the only truly rightous way to tax, anything else denies success, and condemns it, and paves the way fro a socialistic or communistic state.
well take this example
Billy makes 10,000 dollars a year
Bill and Sue make 100,000 a year jointly
and
William and Susan make 1,000,000 a year.
so say they get taxed 15% 20% and 30% respectively (this isn't quite accurate but it is close enough for this
15% of 10,000 is 1,500 10,000- 1,500 = 8,500 for Billy
20% of 100,000 is 20,000 100g - 20g = 80,000 for Bill and Sue
30% of 1mil is 300,000 1mil - 300g = 700,000 for William and Susan
now if it was a flat 22.5% (halfway between 15 and 30)
22.5% of 10,000 is 2,250 total 7,750 as opposed to 8,500
22.5% of 100g is 22,500 total 77,500 as opposed to 80,000
22.5% of 1mil is 225,000 total 775,000 as opposed to 700,000
Utilitarianism- do what accomplishes the most good for the most people. Lower and middle class occupy 98% of the United states.
Con Case and point.