The Instigator
MathandScienceprodigy
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
StrawberryShortcake
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

A God is impossible

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/9/2013 Category: Religion
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 515 times Debate No: 41993
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (7)
Votes (0)

 

MathandScienceprodigy

Pro

argument 1 cause

if we had a cause how bout god.

argument 2 omnipotence

if he is then he can make a rock bigger than himself but he is infinite so he isnt omnipotent b*tch

please argue i will win because i am the smartest.
StrawberryShortcake

Con

Introduction:

Hello. My name is Matt. I am 13 yrs. old. I live in Los Angeles, CA. I registered in debate.org the day this debate was added.

Rebuttals:

I will rebut Pro's arguments subsequently, each concurring with his original argument.

Argument 1: Cause

"if we had a cause how bout god."

Grammatical Errors

1) You always need to capitalize the first letter of a sentence.

2) It is spelled "about", not "bout".

3)When you ask a question, it always has to end with a question mark.

Rebuttal:

We came into existence. God did not. He is eternal.

Argument 2: Omnipotence

"if he is then he can make a rock bigger than himself but he is infinite so he isnt omnipotent"

Grammatical Errors

1) (Same)

2) Isn't is a contraction of "is not" while "isnt" is non-existent. Therefore, according to your sentence, "isn't" would be most appropriate for use.

Rebuttal:

One being able to do both defies logic by definition. If he is infinite in size, it would make sense that he can not create a rock that is larger than himself.

Conclusion:

1) I should be awarded conduct because Pro felt the need to cuss at me.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I eagerly await my opponent's arguments. I hope this wouldn't sadly end in a concession.

Also, I will try to refrain from being and sounding disrespectful.
Debate Round No. 1
MathandScienceprodigy

Pro

Alright. Let us make new contentions.

Argument 1: Non-temporal mind

It is impossible for ANYONE to transcend linear time.
StrawberryShortcake

Con

Rebuttals:

Same rules apply.

Argument 1: Non-temporal mind

"It is impossible for ANYONE to transcend linear time."

It is.

In Einstein's theory of general relativity and the concept of space-time, time is affected by space and gravitational fields.

http://en.wikipedia.org...

Which means that at a certain limit of a gravitational field, one can manage to "transcend" time. This indeed occurs at the event horizon of a blackhole.

http://en.wikipedia.org...

Whatever happens across an event horizon cannot be affected by the confines of space-time. This means that Pro's argument is fallacious - its not that God "did not have time". It's that whatever time God took was FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT FROM THE TIME OF THIS WORLD.

Also, you fail to substantiate your specific argument presented.

Conclusion:
I eagerly await my opponent's arguments. Like said, I hope this does not sadly end in a concession.

Also, my rebuttals remain uncontested.
Debate Round No. 2
MathandScienceprodigy

Pro

MathandScienceprodigy forfeited this round.
StrawberryShortcake

Con

StrawberryShortcake forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
MathandScienceprodigy

Pro

MathandScienceprodigy forfeited this round.
StrawberryShortcake

Con

StrawberryShortcake forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
MathandScienceprodigy

Pro

MathandScienceprodigy forfeited this round.
StrawberryShortcake

Con

StrawberryShortcake forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by JamesHowlett27 3 years ago
JamesHowlett27
"please argue i will win because i am the smartest."... "MathandScienceprodigy"...I cringed I really did. Did he just swear? I think he just swore but I cant believe it. I'm a Christian, but not foolish, many atheists are very intelligent. But you guys should really kick him off the team.
Posted by StrawberryShortcake 3 years ago
StrawberryShortcake
Mary*

My name is not actually Matt. My name is Mary.
Posted by DudeStop 3 years ago
DudeStop
Pro is definitely not the smartest one... I'm an atheist and I could probably take con yet win against him...
Posted by Xenofloppy 3 years ago
Xenofloppy
Pro is a terrible representation of atheists.
Posted by Ieatbagels 3 years ago
Ieatbagels
Hey "The Instigator", how about you use some correct grammar and spelling, and saying your going to win because you smarter is the stupidest argument I have ever heard to win, and try not swearing at someone.
Posted by StrawberryShortcake 3 years ago
StrawberryShortcake
Whoops... Codes fail to register.
Posted by williamfoote 3 years ago
williamfoote
MathandScienceprodigy is good at math and science but fails in english language arts...
No votes have been placed for this debate.