All Big Issues
The Instigator
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

# A God is impossible

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0

Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
 Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point Started: 12/9/2013 Category: Religion Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period Viewed: 539 times Debate No: 41993
Debate Rounds (5)

 Pro argument 1 cause if we had a cause how bout god. argument 2 omnipotence if he is then he can make a rock bigger than himself but he is infinite so he isnt omnipotent b*tch please argue i will win because i am the smartest.Report this Argument Con Introduction: Hello. My name is Matt. I am 13 yrs. old. I live in Los Angeles, CA. I registered in debate.org the day this debate was added. Rebuttals: I will rebut Pro's arguments subsequently, each concurring with his original argument. Argument 1: Cause "if we had a cause how bout god." Grammatical Errors 1) You always need to capitalize the first letter of a sentence. 2) It is spelled "about", not "bout". 3)When you ask a question, it always has to end with a question mark. Rebuttal: We came into existence. God did not. He is eternal. Argument 2: Omnipotence "if he is then he can make a rock bigger than himself but he is infinite so he isnt omnipotent" Grammatical Errors 1) (Same) 2) Isn't is a contraction of "is not" while "isnt" is non-existent. Therefore, according to your sentence, "isn't" would be most appropriate for use. Rebuttal: One being able to do both defies logic by definition. If he is infinite in size, it would make sense that he can not create a rock that is larger than himself. Conclusion: 1) I should be awarded conduct because Pro felt the need to cuss at me. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ I eagerly await my opponent's arguments. I hope this wouldn't sadly end in a concession. Also, I will try to refrain from being and sounding disrespectful.Report this Argument Pro Alright. Let us make new contentions. Argument 1: Non-temporal mind It is impossible for ANYONE to transcend linear time.Report this Argument Con Rebuttals: Same rules apply. Argument 1: Non-temporal mind "It is impossible for ANYONE to transcend linear time." It is. In Einstein's theory of general relativity and the concept of space-time, time is affected by space and gravitational fields. http://en.wikipedia.org... Which means that at a certain limit of a gravitational field, one can manage to "transcend" time. This indeed occurs at the event horizon of a blackhole. http://en.wikipedia.org... Whatever happens across an event horizon cannot be affected by the confines of space-time. This means that Pro's argument is fallacious - its not that God "did not have time". It's that whatever time God took was FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT FROM THE TIME OF THIS WORLD. Also, you fail to substantiate your specific argument presented. Conclusion: I eagerly await my opponent's arguments. Like said, I hope this does not sadly end in a concession. Also, my rebuttals remain uncontested.Report this Argument Pro MathandScienceprodigy forfeited this round. Con StrawberryShortcake forfeited this round. Pro MathandScienceprodigy forfeited this round. Con StrawberryShortcake forfeited this round. Pro MathandScienceprodigy forfeited this round. Con StrawberryShortcake forfeited this round.
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by JamesHowlett27 3 years ago
"please argue i will win because i am the smartest."... "MathandScienceprodigy"...I cringed I really did. Did he just swear? I think he just swore but I cant believe it. I'm a Christian, but not foolish, many atheists are very intelligent. But you guys should really kick him off the team.
Posted by StrawberryShortcake 3 years ago
Mary*

My name is not actually Matt. My name is Mary.
Posted by DudeStop 3 years ago
Pro is definitely not the smartest one... I'm an atheist and I could probably take con yet win against him...
Posted by Xenofloppy 3 years ago
Pro is a terrible representation of atheists.
Posted by Ieatbagels 3 years ago
Hey "The Instigator", how about you use some correct grammar and spelling, and saying your going to win because you smarter is the stupidest argument I have ever heard to win, and try not swearing at someone.
Posted by StrawberryShortcake 3 years ago
Whoops... Codes fail to register.
Posted by williamfoote 3 years ago
MathandScienceprodigy is good at math and science but fails in english language arts...
No votes have been placed for this debate.