The Instigator
Con (against)
7 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
0 Points

A gun ban in the US

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: Select Winner
Started: 1/10/2015 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 441 times Debate No: 68105
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (1)




it s a badidea


You're irrational.
Debate Round No. 1


Resolved - A ban on all guns in the US

Negative Impact

Starting a complete and total ban on guns will not solve anything. The only effective way to actually implement this idea is by having a buy back accompanying it. A buy back or the removal of guns on a compulsory basis, would incite a great deal of harm in the US. People want to have guns, and they think it is their right under the amendments and the constitution. Forcing a removal of those guns, would have long term negative impacts that could lead to another civil war. Countless people have said they would not give back their guns if a buy back happened, and others said they would fight or defend their right to bear arms. The overall negative impact of trying to force people to give up their guns, or stopping their right to defend themselves is a net detriment in the US

0 effect

Banning guns would just result into a regression of other weapons. You ban guns, people go to knives. You ban knives they go to their fists. People will always find ways to hurt people and banning a catalyst for the harm will just result into another catalyst forming.

More regulation but not a ban

The more effective thing would be to issue stronger background checks, limit high capacity magazines, etc. It is something that would have a more positive effect without the fallout of a total ban. More regulation can be a good thing, but a total ban would result in citizens fighting back.

Guns reduce Crime

If you ban gun from civilians, they lose their self defense. Guns will still be around via under ground purchase. A citizen has the right to defend themselves and allowing guns in homes actually reduces robberies and other types of crime because it acts a deterrent. Allowing criminals to have guns, while removing them from civilians would actually increase the crime and murder rate by a significant margin.


What you wrote here struck me as odd, though my answer will be very simple :
You're against God's will, therefore you're wrong.
Debate Round No. 2


Pro provides no argument

For his stance to stand he must show that god exists

vote con


God exists because of the Holy "Tree"-nity, therefore you're against God's will, therefore you are satanic, therefore you are wrong.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Asburnu 2 years ago
Both parties need to provide evidence to back the premises that lead to their conclusion in this arena, There is a place for opinionated rants and unsubstantiated declarations, even on this very site. However, this place is only for
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
only banning all legal guns, will get you anywhere
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by That1User 2 years ago
Who won the debate:Vote Checkmark-
Reasons for voting decision: Con made a good argument as to why there should not be a gun ban in the US. Pro argued that a gun ban is against God's will with no evidence and comitted an ad hominem against con.