The Instigator
Sakushi
Con (against)
The Contender
bradleycllns
Pro (for)

A just government ought to prioritize civil liberties over national security.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
bradleycllns has forfeited round #1.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/2/2017 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 436 times Debate No: 102366
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

Sakushi

Con

I would like to thank my opponent for accepting this debate ahead of time. It is my first formal debate on this site, so I think this should be quite fun.

I will be arguing against the notion that Civil Liberties should be prioritized over National Security in a just government. To begin, I would like to define each of our key terms.

For the term just I would like to propose the Merriam Webster definition of the term. "acting or being in conformity with what is morally upright or good"

As this is a quite open term, I would also like to propose a precise definition of 'Morally Upright or Good'.

Moral: " of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior : ethical moral judgments"

For this reason, I believe the burden of the affirmative is to prove in essence that maintaining Civil Liberties will in all cases bring positive and 'good' results for it's citizens, even in the face of a national crisis.

My argument will be broken up into 3 points.

1. In the circumstance that the nation were to fall into war, the indecencies that would likely occur to the civilians would be far more inhumane and painful than the civil liberties that would likely be lost to have prevented such a situation.

2. Justice cannot be focused only on the individual, and must be comparative. For this reason the 'Justice' or 'Good Effect' for all people in the nation outweights the priorities and concerns of the individuals.

3. It is the governments duty to ensure preventive measures against external and internal threats, however people are obliged to a social contract upon entering it. Therefore they should prioritize dealing with objective threats rather than 'playing nice' with their citizens.

I would again like to thank my opponent for this debate, and I eagerly await his or her reply.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 4 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.