Abortion Is Bad
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
katie_marie
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 3/12/2014 | Category: | Politics | ||
| Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 417 times | Debate No: | 48977 | ||
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)
 Pro  Con If a woman is raped and impregnated... why should she have to keep the baby? Every day she sees that child, she will be reminded of that incident. If a woman has medical issues, and if she gives birth she will die...you're saying she should have to die? Think of third world countries. People with seven kids and all of them are skeletons because the parents can't afford to feed them? It's bad to abort, when the child will end up dying from starvation or disease? It's bad to not end the life before they suffer? And every single child can not be adopted or sponsored...not every person can be forbidden to have sex. Will they abort anyways? Probably not, but it's an example. Think of a woman that gets pregnant. She can't even pay for her own food bills. How is she going to pay for a child? She won't be able to afford proper prenatal care...and not every person in that situation will have someone financially backing them that wants that baby. She won't be able to work during a certain time during her late pregnancy, so who will pay her bills then? So wouldn't it be better to abort the child? |
 |
Post a Comment
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 3 years ago
| xx929 | katie_marie | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con's counter-arguments were sufficient, and required addressing. Pro, you're so silly for making all these 1 round debates, because you're going to lose all of them, by the look of it.
Vote Placed by Finalfan 3 years ago
| xx929 | katie_marie | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro needs to stop producing 1 round debates!
Vote Placed by kbub 3 years ago
| xx929 | katie_marie | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con has several un-answered arguments, but that is the nature of the 1 round debates: they always seem to go to the last poster.