The Instigator
bigwigaustin
Pro (for)
The Contender
Ilikeramen
Con (against)

Abortion is Murder

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
Ilikeramen has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/20/2017 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 month ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 212 times Debate No: 105200
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (5)
Votes (0)

 

bigwigaustin

Pro

In this debate, I am taking the stance of the Pro. I think that abortion should be classified as murder and should be illegal.
For the first round, simply post your stance on this issue.
For the second round, we'll state the facts for our arguments.
For the third and fourth rounds, we'll counter each other.
For the final round, each of us will finish countering and will provide closing statements.
I look forward to debating you.
Ilikeramen

Con

I am against this statement that abortion is murder
Debate Round No. 1
bigwigaustin

Pro

So, let's begin. Here are some of the reasons, statements, and facts that I believe prove that abortion truly is murder.
To prove that abortion is murder, I will need to first prove that the organism is in fact alive. Thus, I am going to prove that the organism inside of the mother is a living human baby from the moment fertilization occurs.
First off, the organism inside of the womb is undeniably and unarguably a human. From a scientific viewpoint, as I assume you take if you are an advocate for abortion, from the moment when the sperm from the male reaches the egg, a new living entity is formed, referred to as a human zygote. Now let's go through the characteristics that define if something is alive or not and see if a human zygote fulfills these requirements:
1. Composed of a cell or cells(obviously, yes)
2. Able to grow, metabolize, and respond to the environment(yes, it grows, metabolizes, and responds to the womb)
3. Able to move(yes)
4. Able to respire(yes)
5. Able to reproduce(this is listed as a characteristic. In different stages in the womb, it does not have the needed reproductive organs. However, the ability to reproduce does not have to qualify as a requirement. Many humans have been born without reproductive organs or have had mutilations and, obviously, still have survived. Thus, reproduction is obviously not a solid requirement to determine that something is alive).
So, the human zygote is alive. Now let's go through a few other common arguments used for abortion.
Many argue that the human zygote is not a sentient being and use that as a driving cause for their arguments. This can easily be determined invalid, unless you would also like to argue that we can kill people in comas(who have the same exact level of sentience, if not less than, a human zygote.
Many others will go off on a completely different path, claiming that the zygote isn't even a human zygote! Once again, this can easily be disproved. The zygote is composed of human DNA and other molecules specifically known to humans, so the nature of the zygote is undeniably human.
I'm interested in hearing your views, and in the following two rounds we will begin countering each other's statements.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 5
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by DnD 1 month ago
DnD
I would abort if i knew the child would be disabled, or if my life was in jeopardy.
Posted by Shad0wXx 1 month ago
Shad0wXx
@klmkmlk While that is terrible, I don"t see how killing the child (who isn"t even at fault) would solve the problem. That is attempting to use 2 wrongs to make a right. It seems simple enough to me. For example, if someone shoots you, does that give you the right to kill their child? Who is at fault?
Posted by klmkmlk 1 month ago
klmkmlk
what if the women is raped should she have to go the rest of her life knowing she carried her attackers baby
Posted by philochristos 1 month ago
philochristos
On second thought. . .
Posted by philochristos 1 month ago
philochristos
Too many rounds! Remove round 5, and I'll take it.
This debate has 6 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.