The Instigator
Debatess
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
vardas0antras
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

Abortion is bad

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
vardas0antras
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/13/2011 Category: Politics
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,362 times Debate No: 14762
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

Debatess

Pro

Unless you get rapped there should be no reason to get abortion. When people have sex they know that there is a possibility that a child is at hand. Use protection then if you want to have sex and you don't want a child.
vardas0antras

Con

||Burden of proof||
My opponent is the instigator, hence, he has the burden of proof. All I have to do is disprove his arguments.

||My opponents arguments||
"When people have sex they know that there is a possibility that a child is at hand."
This does not make abortion wrong, only more frequant.

"Use protection then if you want to have sex and you don't want a child."
The same point as above.

||Conclusion||
My opponent has yet to make arguments.
Debate Round No. 1
Debatess

Pro

Debatess forfeited this round.
vardas0antras

Con

Arguments extended
Debate Round No. 2
Debatess

Pro

What is right about killing a child without them having a say about it. Give me one good reason and I can back down from my argument. I cannot see a reason for people to abort there child unless they had no choice(rape.)
When people have sex they make a choice to have sex a child occasionally comes with that choice unless protection is used. An argument cannot be made that a women needs to have a choice whether or not to keep her child for it is not her choice to be made. It is the child's.
vardas0antras

Con

Due to my opponents forfeit (which is a good reason to give me the conduct vote) my opponent will not be able to refute my arguments. That is his fault so he shall have to take whatever nuisance this situation brings. Lets begin.

||My opponents arguments ||
"What is right about killing a child without them having a say about it."
Abortion is not killing a child. Abortion is the termination of pregnancy via the removal of the fetus.

Now, a woman's body knows to dispel a fetus if it has any serious mutations that would prevent it from becoming a functional human being. This is why babies are never born without major organs, since the woman miscarries long before the fetus is carried to term. Abortion is thus something that is routinely practiced by natural biological processes in nature.
http://www.healthguidance.org...
So, if nature doesn't considers the fetus a human being and all our knowledge (science) is based on nature then why should we consider a fetus a human being? The simple answer is that we shouldn't.

However, all that I just said is unnecessary since my opponent never proved that a fetus is a human being and as stated in round one, he has the burden of proof. With this being ignored by my opponent, his entire round falls apart.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Debatess 6 years ago
Debatess
Sorry I didn't mean to press three days.
Posted by wjmelements 6 years ago
wjmelements
"The voting period will last 3 days."

I suggest you make this longer.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by socialpinko 6 years ago
socialpinko
Debatessvardas0antrasTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by RougeFox 6 years ago
RougeFox
Debatessvardas0antrasTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: This should be obvious