The Instigator
Louistar
Pro (for)
Tied
1 Points
The Contender
Anti-atheist
Con (against)
Tied
1 Points

Abortion is imorral

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/4/2013 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 571 times Debate No: 33294
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

Louistar

Pro

To clarify the topic, we are not debating whether or not it should be legal or if it is a good or bad thing, merely if it is moral in cases in which the mother's life is not at risk.

My opponent may go first.
Anti-atheist

Con

Over population

babies need to die sometimes.
Debate Round No. 1
Louistar

Pro

Louistar forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Louistar

Pro

To say that they must die some time is to say that shooting people on the streets is OK because they were gonna die anyways. The intentional killing of any living, conscious, human is murder.
Anti-atheist

Con

I didn't say that. I said some need to die. Not everyone on the street. What if it was salin's mom? Would it be immoral to convince stalin's mom to get an abortion? Its good sometimes
Debate Round No. 3
Louistar

Pro

It is still murder is you kill them before you have evidence of their intentions to commit a crime.
Debate Round No. 4
Louistar

Pro

Louistar forfeited this round.
Anti-atheist

Con

I am winner
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
LouistarAnti-atheistTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct is lost to forfeit. Argument rounds from con included "Me win" and "I am winner" which cost him spelling, and hurt his case. The lack of arguments are too close to call. UPDATE: Reviewing the records of pro and con, this is pro's first debate here and con's 58th, thus conduct shifted to tied for suspected noob-sniping.
Vote Placed by ClassicRobert 3 years ago
ClassicRobert
LouistarAnti-atheistTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: This debate was awful. Conduct only goes to Anti-atheist because Louistar forfeited.