Abortion is murder.
Debate Rounds (3)
You will quit this site soon, murderers helper.
As to whether abortion is murder, entirely depends on the opinions of those discussing. However you've raised the topic and I will answer. As for your allegation that I will 'quit this site soon', I find that highly doubtful. But for this current debate I ask that you remain polite and on topic if that is possible. Now, as you have not set any standards for this topic. I will begin in round one.
Claiming that abortion is always murder, begs the question of what murder is.
The oxford dictionary definition is as follows: "The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another"
Following this simple definition, and running in counterpoint with your statement of "Killing a potential human is murder. Period." I have to question as to whether a cluster of cells, the blastocyst, in the fallopian tube is a 'human being'. At this stage, this cell cluster has indeed the potential to grow into a fetus, and then a baby. But can you define this series of connected cells a human yet? The chances of it implanting into the womb are slim, slimmer yet that it will grow to full term.
Admittedly, abortion of a blastocyst is highly unlikely due to the extremely early stage in pregnancy. But even after which, can the growing cell count be determined as a human being yet? By lawful standards before 23 weeks. No it cannot.
As for opinion coming into play. You, as previously mentioned, stated "Killing a potential human is murder. Period." I understand that any combination of a healthy ovum and sperm have the 'potential' to become a human. So does that mean every time a woman has a period, or a man masturbates they are committing murder? Does that mean the use of contraception is plain murder? Or because you do not deem them pregnant yet, they are now infallible to your death sentence to these people?
Irresponsible parents that do not tech their children the responsibility of creating human life, and look to .gov to govern and pay for their own irresponsibility are murderers.
Good parents raise good children.
It takes 2 parents to raise a child.
Singly parents eff up A LOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Even within your examples. People who are reckless with contraception or parents who simply do not teach their children. Forcing them to bring a pregnancy full term is not the answer. Better education, yes. But not forcing a child upon unprepared and un-wanting parents. It is wrong for the parents with the potential of seriously damaging mental, and physical, health. It is also unfair for the child themselves. They can be born into an environment unready for them, with un-wanting parents who can go as far as to resent them.
To condemn irresponsible parents as murderers is also wrong. Some parents, such as those with unplanned pregnancies that carried them to full term, simply weren't ready to be parents. The pressure of society to avoid abortion however can force them into a corner that is unhealthy for the child. Other parents simply need more help with educating their children.
I've known fantastic parents with awful children. The parental environment matters a lot, but it is not the sole consideration when it comes to a child's upbringing. Whilst marriage is not a factor really in this debate, I will point out that there are amazing parents who are not married. Marriage is not required to stay together.
How many potentially great minds have we killed here, under liberal dictation?
We will never know how great the mind could have been of the babe if we offed them.
Many great minds have died in the womb, thanks to abortion.
My next debate, and certainly indisputable.
Keep shooting babies, dillhole.
I'm arguing that having the choice to abort is just and shouldn't be taken away from people. Of course I'm not citing against abortion.
You can say that, but then again how many terrorists, murders, and rapists have been prevented? You can't argue that great minds are sacrificed through abortion without recognizing that the equally harmful may have been aborted.
I think I have said enough, and this debate is starting to clearly get to you, so in conclusion.
Parenthood is not always the right answer. Carrying a child full term is not always the right answer. Adoption is not always the right answer. There are times where the mother simply cannot carry the child for medical reasons. There are times where emotionally continuing the pregnancy can be damaging to both involved. There are times in which hardships will be placed upon a child if carried to full term.
Telling someone they should have carried the pregnancy to full term, or that they are murders for choosing abortion is simply not your place to say. Only the people involved truly have the say in the matter and, as difficult a choice abortion is without the constant stigmatism that comes with it, it is their choice to make.
I wish you the best of luck in the future, and that you might open your eyes to the people around you. Everyone has different opinions. Accept them and the world will be a better place.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by gomergcc 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||5|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro more just made insults than made an argument
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.