Abortion is murder
Debate Rounds (3)
We are taught that killing other people is wrong, also when they are smaller and weaker than us or more dependent on others. Yet still a lot of people think that abortion is alright. Abortion is killing another human, and as if that"s not bad enough in itself it"s killing an innocent life that has no way of defending itself. But of course, that is only true, depending on when life starts; at birth, or at conception. We are not certain on this matter, but one thing is certain, at some point the embryo get too developed, and we can call that a person. Already at the +8th week the embryo feels real pain, both psychological and physical pain. Just like a toddler, embryos are still a human being, a smaller and way more dependent human being, but none the less still a human being. This is a difference in degree and not kind. Therefor is abortion murder, and should be illegal.
First of all, I'd like to say that abortion is not a murder. The definition of a murder is to illegally kill a human being on purpose. However, embryos are not a human being. It is a post-human being. It is a developed post-human cells. So technically it is not a murder. Besides if you count an embryo as a human. Then that makes all women a murderer. Why so? Because each time we have a menstruation, it means we're killing a post-human cell that could actually be a human.
Next, I have an opinion that abortion is useful. Surely people aborts their child for a reason. Sometimes female teenagers get pregnant, dumped by the father and ruin their lives. Yes, it's the consequences that they had to face because they had sex but I am a big believer of second chances. I believe that all of us make mistakes. No matter how small or big it is. Therefore, a female teenager, no matter how bitchy she can be, she should have a second chance by getting an abortion.
Abortion can also be useful for poor people. Sometimes, even married couples had to abort their going-to-be child because economical problems. I think that is reasonable because it's better to remove the embryo before it is born and have to face with being poor and struggling with life. This goes to the female teenagers too. If an underaged couple had to quit school, raised a child together and built a family, it would be a total chaos. They would fight a lot and maybe even get abusive. The innocent child does not have to go through that if they aborted him/her.
I noticed that Con also said that embryo feels real psychological and physical pain. Embrios might feel it, no one actually really knows that for sure, but does the embryo remember it? No, it does not. People usually started to remember after the age of 3 or 4. I doubt that a one month child can remember anything, let alone an embryo. Therefore we do not actually harm them because they don't remember it. It's like breaking someone's heart but they never thought we did. Maybe it's not right to do so but it is the mother's right after all because if she didn't want to abort him then surely she wouldn't even consider it.
Therefore, my conclusion is just because people thinks abortion is cruel and is considered as a murder, it doesn't mean it's a crime. You might be saying that killing a going-to-be human is a crime but does it go the same with animals and/or plants? Just because we're on top of the food chains, doesn't mean we don't get a natural selection. You either have to ruin their life or let them ruin yours.
You"re talking about getting second chances. I want to clarify that I"m not against this statement, and believe that people should be able to get second chances in society. However we have to still take care of those who can"t defend themselves. Article 3 in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights state that "Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person" this means that we should always preserve the life and security of a human being, even if it means that we cannot give that "second chance" to teenage girls to maintain their earlier lifestyle.
This is also extends to the poor family example. The right to life is still stronger than not having to grow up in a poor family. Even if there might be more problems than in a less poor environment, and even if they have to fight through some of the limits that poverty will give, there"s no doubt that it will most likely not be a life of purely sad memories. Being poor doesn"t mean that your life is worth less than others.
Lastly I noticed that pro came with the argument about whether or not embryos feel pain during an abortion. As a matter of fact it appears as if they do (1). And yes it"s true that no one would be able to remember what happened to them during that time of their life. Even less would remember the feeling of getting aborted, well obviously, since they died during this process. But even if a child would not be able to remember anything all the way to 3-4 years, does not justify us as grownups to expose these innocent children for unnecessary pain.
Embryo is a potential human. However about 10 to 20 percents of embryo ends in miscarriage. Every human was once an embryo but not every embryo is going to be a human. Just like an unfertilized egg is. Unfertilized egg is a potential human. It is in fact a potential embryo which indirectly makes it a potential human. Yes, unfertilized egg has less chances of being a human than an embryo but they are both potential human. It's like saying that A has a sin of lying, B has a sin of murdering, yet A does not sin while B does. They both "have sins" even though A is more acceptable than B.
Of course, women could not have a choose with their menstruation and it happens naturally. But sometimes, so do embryos. I know that sex is intended or does not happen naturally but what about all the teenage girls who gets pregnant because they were raped? What about girls who have to sold theirselves to become sex slaves and get pregnant? It's not something that they wanted.
"Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person." Everyone. Of course. Every human or post/potential human. Just like the unfertilized eggs, sperms and all embryos. We could never make everyone happy, you know? Besides, it is up to the mother anyway right? If the teen mom wants to sacrifice her child so she could have a second chance, why not? Let's say a 15 years old got pregnant and aborted her child. Why would it be wrong? Imagine being in the child's place. He/she might have to be raised without a father, most likely to be in a poor condition, possibly to be disowned by his/her mom's family, being called out as "love child", etc. Don't you think it's too much? It also sacrifices the mother's future and dreams. Do you really think sacrificing all these for a life of a child who might end up hating herself/himself? Like comegys59's comment said, a girl's life worth more than a potential human's life. It is also a woman's right to decide things like having her own stomach as a 9-month-home of a love child that could sacrifice her own future and whole life.
Anyway, thank you for the link. However it said that after 20 weeks old unborn babies can feel pain. That means around 5 months old. Reminder that abortion is illegal to several states in the US when performed after 18 weeks old. Average abortions are performed during 6 weeks old which mean less pain and consciousness for the unborn. Also, it might be unnecessary for us but what about for the teen moms? Necessity is relative. Remember, any woman would be happy to bear a child of her own IF it's the right time and does not destroy her future and all of that. I remind you that it is the woman's right to do so.
I apologize that I do not have links to these informations because you can just google it and it will pop right up.
There is a difference between what a womans body naturally select to do, and the act of choosing to interfere in a pregnancy. This is where the killing part happens. It's like dying a natural death, instead of being killed by another person. For adults there is too a difference between dying from old age and getting shot by someone else.
You're saying something about why mothers who want to sacrifice their child should be able to do so. My short answer to this is that sometimes we as a society have to make certain choses in order to protect those who are weaker than most and those who do not have the voice to speak for themselves. Where would our society be if we didn't once in a while make decisions to protect these people?
Just because they are smaller and more dependant on other people taking care of them dosen't mean we can just get rid of them, even when they are seemed as unwanted. You don't just get rid of a child that have already been born, why should you get rid of a child in development.
Yes, I do understand your point. But I also have a point of view that abortion is a form of voluntary natural selection. Let's say someone is about to strangle you to death but you grabbed the nearest knife and stabbed him. He died and you felt like you did a horrible thing. It is in fact a form of self-defense. You might be doing it voluntarily but the intention of the action is self-defense. So is abortion. If a young girl does not want to be judged or throw her life away, she can abort the baby and that is not wrong or a crime. It is her choice to make. It's either she want to defend herself or if she want to just give up on life.
You're saying that we have to make choices to protect those who are weaker, who are the minority. But look at the pro abortion's point of view. These views are the minority. People keep talking about morality but then they start to treat others like craps. Yes, I know the morals are important to keep but we still have to look out for ourselves because sometimes no one wants to stand up for us. Again, imagine having a love child and people started treating you like craps. There were once an social experiment where a perfect, beautiful, genius, and friendly girl faked her pregnant. Everyone loved her but when the rumors spread, they started to bully her, push her around, treat her like garbage and let's say if it was real, do you think it's healthy for the girl AND the baby?
Yes, an embryo does not have the voice to speak for themselves. But what about the mother? They have the voice but people don't listen to them. Whatever choices they make, they are wrong. They will be judged, they will be unaccepted by the society. We can't always give people what they want, we don't. Why? Because everything is relative and all we can do in the end of the day is to make ourselves happy with a choice that we have to make. And again, that is the mother's right.
In my opinion, these developing children are not seem as unwanted. They are unwanted. If they are not, then no one would even consider aborting them. And here's 2 major reasons why you don't get rid of a child that has already been born and get rid of a child in development:
1. Killing born children is illegal while abortion is relatively not.
2. Born children have developed emotions and full senses while let's say 5 weeks old embryos don't which mean it will hurt less for both the baby and the mother.
I apologize for any logically wrong statements. I would say morally wrong statements but morally is more relative since it come from the hearts. Thank you for reading these very long and boring debates.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||2||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Only Con had sources, so they're the most reliable.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.