Abortion is wrong and needs to stop please tell me im wrong.
Debate Rounds (3)
To answer your question 1/3 of 1% abortions happen because of rape.
But does that really invalidate my statement? It's just saying that a minority of abortions are cause by rape, there can be other reasons and 0.333% of a few million is still a big number :I
According to this suspicious looking website >>;,
95% of abortions are done as birth control, 1% are done because of rape/incest, 1% because of fetal abnormalities, and 3% due to the mother's health problems.
Technically, it's more like 1 out of 5 abortions, the way we're speaking of abortion. Which means something closer to 20% of a few million, which, if I'm not mistaken, is a pretty big number. And we can justify health problems too, I suppose, because a would you rather have one dead person, or two of them?
Fetal abnormalities is also fair I guess, because it might die anyways :^
At the moment of conception a human child comes to existence. This new life has DNA and offspring of human parents, it can only be described as human life.
"it is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception"- Dr.Micheline Matthews- Roth, Harvard Medical School.
"... I submit that human life is present throughout this entire sequence from conception to adulthood and that any interruption at any point throughout this time constitutes a termination of humanlife." - Dr.Alfred Bongipvami, University of Pennslyvania.
"By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception." -Professor Hymie Gordon, Founder of the Mayo Clinic's Medical Genectics Program.
It's still a fetus. A fetus is just a stage of development, not some sort off other species, so I don't get what you mean?
I never rejected the idea that a fetus was a human :1
I also never said that human lives weren't being ended... I think you're missing my point here
I... honestly don't know what to say this round, I made my points earlier and you've made no real attempts to refute them or provide evidence that goes against them, so I'll just leave it as is.
Vote pro :D
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Balacafa 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: This is an easy vote. Con and Pro shared a split BOP. Con had no offense and relied solely on a defensive case. Whilst Pro's arguments were unconvincing, I have no choice but to vote Pro based on the fact that it was impossible for Con to prove anything without him actually providing arguments in the debate. Con's rebuttals were attacks on arguments that Pro never actually made. An example of this is in the final round. Pro never rejected the idea that a fetus was human yet con felt the need to respond to this instead of addressing Pro's arguments. This meant that Pro's arguments still stand and Con never had any arguments to begin with. I vote Pro based on this.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.