The Instigator
anders1146
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
emospongebob527
Pro (for)
Winning
2 Points

Abortion (only Christians please)

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
emospongebob527
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/4/2012 Category: Religion
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 536 times Debate No: 27779
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (2)

 

anders1146

Con

(The reason I say Christians only is because Atheists have no moral compass and therefore a debate with them would be pointless
P1. murder is morally wrong
P2. abortion is murder
C. abortion is wrong
emospongebob527

Pro

I will allow Con to provide proof for his R1 claims.
Debate Round No. 1
anders1146

Con

anders1146 forfeited this round.
emospongebob527

Pro

emospongebob527 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
anders1146

Con

anders1146 forfeited this round.
emospongebob527

Pro

In the little non-evidential syllogism you posit there is room for much corruption and no proof. You simply make pointless claims.
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Zaradi 4 years ago
Zaradi
Still would love to debate you on that.
Posted by anders1146 4 years ago
anders1146
I apologize I should have phrased that better. My reasoning behind that was Atheists have no God and therefore no reason behind their morals
Posted by emj32 4 years ago
emj32
I would love to debate you on your position that 'atheists have no moral compass'
Posted by UltimateSkeptic 4 years ago
UltimateSkeptic
lol, this has to be a joke...
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by iamnotwhoiam 4 years ago
iamnotwhoiam
anders1146emospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct for Pro for Con's unwarranted attack on atheists.
Vote Placed by YYW 4 years ago
YYW
anders1146emospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments are a wash because PRO refuted con's "pointless claims." Unfortunately, he made none of his own. Irony is that this debate seems to have been 'aborted'.