The Instigator
Con (against)
0 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
0 Points

Abortion scooterswifty

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/21/2015 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 10 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 347 times Debate No: 84187
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (4)
Votes (0)




Abortion is wrong. They are living creatures and they don't deserve to die! They didn't do anything. If you didn't want a baby you shouldn't have had sex. This is the parents fault and it shouldn't be legal to kill inoccent creatures. This is crazy and wrong and very unbiblical. Again, they didn't do anything and they don't deserve to die. Stop abortion!!!


Counter Arguments:
Firstly life is not inherently valuable, we can see this in the wide availability of antibiotics, and animal experimentation. It is clear that only certain life forms are actually valuable to us. These include endangered species, and ones which have traits worthy of personhood (consciousness, emotional complexity).
Next the whole, "if you didn't want a baby, you shouldn't have had sex" applies to a great many other situations. For example "if you didn't want a fungal infection, you should have looked after your health". There will always be consequences to your actions, but that does not mean you lose your bodily rights especially for an organism which isn't even conscious.
Lastly, the Bible is not a valid source.

Now for my arguments:
Firstly we can all agree that the pregnant women is a person as she possesses emotional complexity, self-awareness, ect. Now lets take a look at the fetus:
From the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists:
"The fact that the cortex can receive and process sensory inputs from 24 weeks is only the beginning
of the story and does not necessarily mean that the fetus is aware of pain or knows that
it is in pain. It is only after birth, when the development, organisation and reorganisation of
the cortex occurs in relation to the action and reaction of the neonate and infant to a world
of meaning and symbols, that the cortex can be assumed to have mature features."

This source shows that the bare minimum of features needed for fetal awareness does not develop until around 24 weeks, which is after the vast majority of abortions occur. It is clear that the fetus simply does not have the traits necessary for even consciousness, meaning that it does not have the right to force the women to carry it.

Next our current laws do not force people to do things with their body that they don't want to. For example you can't force somebody to give blood, even if it is needed to save the life of somebody next door. We certainly wouldn't force someone to give up their bodily rights for a rodent or some other lower animal, so why should we force a women to give up their bodily rights for and organism that hasn't even developed a mature brain?
Debate Round No. 1


They do not have consciousness. They do not have a living/matured brain. They are "rodents", as you have said. They are nonetheless living creatures. They have cells, and this is all you need for something to be living. There are endangered plants, as you said are some of the most important creatures. They're brains are not mature. They do not have a conscious. They're still living though, aren't they? Don't say that they aren't living, because they are. Sure, they respond to music. Yes, they have neurons , but they don't really have a consciousness. We can't talk to them, because they won't understand us. They just aren't conscious. But it's ok to kill living things that will one day posses consciousness? This is where the confusion begins.

I believe in the bible. I understand that you do not. I know what the bible says about abortion, and you obviously don't. However, I will not challenge you on the sayings of the bible. I cannot tell you what to believe, nor will I. I will say the from what I have read, abortion is not okay.

Abortion is killing. Here is my proof.

The scientific viewpoint on the issue. Many people try to claim that the unborn is just a blob of tissue, nothing more than a tumor. But it is a scientific and medical fact, based on experimental evidence, that the fetus is a living, growing, thriving human being, directing his or her own development. The unborn baby is never part of the mother's body. By the end of the second week of pregnancy, there is a distinct embryo present. The fetus has a developing brain and a rudimentary heart. By the end of the third week of pregnancy, the fetus has the beginnings of vertebrae, developing eyes and ears, a closed circulatory system (separate from the mother's), a working heart, the beginnings of lungs, and budding limbs. By the end of the fourth week of pregnancy, the fetus has a developing nose, and a pancreas. By the end of the fifth week of pregnancy, the fetus has the beginnings of vertebrae, a bony jaw and clavicle, developing eyes, ears, and nose, a closed circulatory system, a working heart, lungs, limbs, hands, feet, and a pancreas. By the end of the sixth week of pregnancy, the fetus has a vertebral column, a bony jaw and clavicle, a primitive cranium, ribs, a developing nervous system, a closed circulatory system with a working heart, developing eyes, ears, and nose, lungs, limbs, hands, feet, a pancreas, a bladder, kidneys, a tongue, a larynx, a thyroid body, and germs of teeth. By the end of the seventh week of pregnancy, the fetus has a vertebral column, a bony jaw and clavicle, a primitive cranium, ribs, femur, tibia, palate, upper jaw, developing nervous system, a closed circulatory system with a working heart, developing eyes,ears, and nose, lungs, arms, legs, hands, feet, a pancreas, a bladder, kidneys, a tongue, a larynx, a thyroid body, germs of teeth, and the beginnings of muscles. By the end of the second month of pregnancy, the fetus has a vertebral column, a bony jaw, clavicle, and palate, a cranium, ribcage, femur, tibia, forearms that can be distinguished from arms, and thighs that can be distinguished from legs, a developing nervous system, sympathetic nerves (meaning the fetus can feel pain), a closed circulatory system and a working heart, eyes, developing ears and nose, lungs, arms and forearms, legs and thighs, hands and feet, a pancreas, a bladder, kidneys, a tongue, a larynx, a thyroid, germs of teeth, and developing muscles. --gray's anatomy

This article from the ehealth forum shows that they are living things. They have lives. They don't have consciousness, but they will soon enough. Your argument makes a good point, but there is lots of proof out there that shows that abortion is murder. I understand that it is their body, and that we can't make them do anything with their personal being, but that's not what this is about. This is about choosing for yourself. This is about your choices. This is about right and wrong. I'm just asking that mothers would make the right choice. That the mothers would choose life.


The part about endangered species was simply an example of an organism which is protected. However they are only protected because if the species goes extinct, it may have negative affects on people. If you kill an endangered species, you are not charged with murder, you have to pay a fine and do some jail time.

Next most of your argument revolves around the concept: They are alive, therefore it is wrong to kill them. This argument ignores the fact many living things including bacteria, fungi, and plants are living, however are not considered valuable at all. It is not considered wrong to take antibiotics or set up a few rat traps. Now why should it be considered wrong to abort a fetus that doesn't even have brain functions on par with a rat's.

That ehealthforum source you cited only proves one thing, that the fetus is a living, which I have shown means nothing, considering our treatment of other living organisms.

The last argument you bring up is the idea that it will become conscious at some point in time. For this it is important to remember that we treat things how they are, not based on what they will become. A presidential candidate is not the president until they are elected and a criminal is only a criminal until they are convicted. It is also important to remember that the potential for a baby exists the second a boy and girl enter the same room, yet they are not arrested for not having the sex which could conceive a baby. The potential may be there, but that is all it is, potential, and in no way trumps the bodily rights of a person.
Debate Round No. 2
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by scootersswifty 10 months ago
You currently have 2 days, 23 hours, and about 58 minutes to post your argument.
Posted by komododragon8 10 months ago
How long will we have to post our arguments each round?
Posted by mcox21 10 months ago
Posted by mcaba21 10 months ago
No votes have been placed for this debate.