Debate Rounds (3)
This is because the world is less religion orientated, but I must ask: What did this point have to do with this argument!"
"Its all about promoting stuff that has been looked down upon for centuries such as abortion."
and freedom of speech, women's rights and individualism. I don't see what so bad about this in hindsight.
"If a teenager gets pregnant by a birth control mistake, she chose to engage in sexual activities, not the baby."
Baby, according to wikipedia, is a human offspring from birth to 12 months. A fetus, is not a baby. It is the teenager's choice, not the fetus's, I agree but by all means that says that it is the woman's responsibility, the woman's choice to have an abortion or not.
" If she is still in school she shouldn't even have sex on her mind. She should be worried about passing school." to this I say, "to err is human, to forgive is divine." Humans are, by nature, idiots but does that mean we should punish their idiocy. The teenager has a burden of responsibility now which means that there is less likely chance of succession in school, like I said in round one. I also say, that teenagers have sexual hormones raging around their body, and whether it's curiosity or lust, inevitably some will have sex, irresponsibly I might add.
You mention that the FETUS at five months has a fast beating heart, yet you do not say how this equates to conscience, sentience or anything that might strengthen your argument. You then proceed to talk incomprehensibly but I got the gist.
"A prime example of abortions done of evil ,not from the parent but doctor, is the the Dr. Kermit Gosnell case. He killed babies that were already out of the womb ,exactly what people today are saying is it's OK to murder just as long as the mom's OK with it."
I didn't specify how Dr Kermit Gosnell Killed those babies, but if they were born then killed, not aborted, then it is infanticide not abortion. I read up on the case. According to wikipedia, he was charged with malpractice, letting a patient die, preforming Illegal abortions and killing 7 born babies. It appears that this doctor was inept and possibly sadistic and I will give it to you, but only because of the ultra-specific context, otherwise it doesn't prove that all abortion is 'Evil'; remember all those shades of grey(hmm...sounds like a book.)
The case of the baby in the bathroom was not abortion, it was straight up infanticide, and not merciful in anyway and cannot be equated to all abortion if at all. You also use the Slippery slope fallacy, " I bet this girl did it because if you can kill a baby in a clinic why not in a bathroom?" You say that if we allow legal abortion by professional doctors, than people will think it ok to straight up choke children to death. The woman was clearly not fit to have children at all and should have gotten a legal abortion.
Then you sort of go insane..."And how dare you say we are happy with war! My father was a marine, now retired, and would tell me stories of how his friend would die in front of him and nothing he could do but defend the country. If a count is going to attack us their is not much we can do but defend ourselves. If Korea launches missiles at us and we shoot them down, we have to attack to defend America. What can we do, watch and become a communist country?"
Well first, when I said 'we are perfectly happy of war' I should have been specific. I meant to say 'Our society is ok with war' Either way, I wasn't trying to justify war; I was simply trying to make a point with the geneva conventions. Lastly, why did a debate on abortion escalate to Communism?
1.an infant or very young child.
2.a newborn or very young animal.
3.the youngest member of a family, group, etc.
4.an immature or childish person.
5.a human fetus.
It depends on the site you look it up on. Could you kill a "fetus" that has a heart, face, organs and all things necessary for life, exactly the same as a baby out of the womb? And if you would say yes, don't answer it in your next argument.
Yes to err is human and to forgive is divine but humans aren't punished at all. We have all sorts of electronics that spoil us and makes us think anything is okay until the damage is to far done.
In my eyes, infanticide and abortion are the same thing. Abortion is the killing off a baby inside the womb. The only difference between the girl killing her baby and abortion is that she wasn't a doctor and it was done in a bathroom. You tell me that baby isn't legally a baby until the second it come out of the womb? That's impossible, theirs no way for that babies heart to start beating, for it's blood to start flowing coming out of the uterus. Their are videos of babies in the womb, being dismembered and trying to get away from suffering. I honestly doubt that's how how they say the baby will react. I watched a video to wear a girl went undercover as a pregnant mom to see what happens in an abortion clinic and what they tell you. I have a bunch of stories of people going to be a nurse during an abortion and quit working at the clinic because of watching what they do. You don't need a PHD to tell if something is alive or not.
And yes you were saying we are happy with war. I got mad because you going off and insulting my father's work. He was gone for 3 years of my life stationed and fighting for our country and saying we are OK with it. I doubt any one is OK with war but can we control others that want war? No, so we defend ourselves. Me bringing up communism was one sentence. I doubt that means this third part of the argument is all about communism. Learn the difference between changing the conversation and stating an example. You brought up euthanasia as an example. Does that mean the conversation was about euthanasia?
"Yes to err is human and to forgive is divine but humans aren't punished at all. We have all sorts of electronics that spoil us and makes us think anything is okay until the damage is to far done."
Yes let's blame our technology and not the irresponsibility of the adult's in our lives whose responsibility was to educate us on the real world. I was making a point that stupid mistakes are inevitable but should we punish them for that; I made it really clear so I assume you do think so. I can't respond because you have a completely different philosophy here; Let's continue
"In my eyes, infanticide and abortion are the same thing."
Well, in my last arguments I thought I made a very clear distinction. Let me reiterate: The abortion we are discussing is a legal termination of an undeveloped fetus under the age of 24 weeks. Infanticide is murder of a born infant. Yes we could be talking about all abortion, including illegal but I don't support illegal abortion, we have a compromise to keep things humane, it's just some people don't like compromise.
"That's impossible, theirs no way for that babies heart to start beating, for it's blood to start flowing coming out of the uterus."
"And yes you were saying we are happy with war. I got mad because you going off and insulting my father's work. He was gone for 3 years of my life stationed and fighting for our country and saying we are OK with it. I doubt any one is OK with war but can we control others that want war? No, so we defend ourselves. Me bringing up communism was one sentence. I doubt that means this third part of the argument is all about communism. Learn the difference between changing the conversation and stating an example."
Well, even if I did say I was happy with war, I said in the next arguments that that is not what I meant. You seem to ramble again on a topic which hasn't anything to do with the debate at hand. Me bringing up war was one sentence as well, I just harped on it because when you said a sentence about communism, and when you that entire paragraph on war, it didn't support you argument or if it did you forgot to link them together.
As for the definition of baby, well, we seem to be at a stalemate on that.
In conclusion, abortion is ok because it is a medical procedure, which is for the humane interest of both parties, and it can only take place under 24 weeks. People are stupid and our technological advances can rectify our stupidity.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by black_squirrel 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||2||3|
Reasons for voting decision: CON does not really address PRO's argument that the brain of a fetus/zygote is too underdeveloped to have conscience. But I gave sources to Con, because CON had at least some sources.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.