The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
1 Points

Abusive language is bad! Must be avoided.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/30/2013 Category: Society
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 654 times Debate No: 41447
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (1)




I'll negate the argument of con (although I don't believe there can be anyone against the title, so if you are convinced then don't abuse ever again)


I shall offer up some potential definitions for this debate.

Abusive: Harming someone physically or mentally

Language: A synonym for "tongue"

Abusive Language: Harming someone with your tongue.

I would like to start my arguments round two.
Debate Round No. 1


You must start your argument in first round. Anyway do it now please.


I would like to use a transitional argument.

1.Someone attacks you with their tongue. This paralyses you.
2.You insult their girlfriend or boyfriend.
3.They punch you.
4. You use a paralyze heal.
5. They punch you again.
6. You use your handy dandy Pikachu and shock them until their heart stops.
7. Pikachu doesn't evolve, because it has no desire for power, and would like to continue to be an easy target for pedophiles- I mean Team Rocket.

You are obviously telling me to censor what I say and do, because you think it will bring about Pikachu related harm to myself. I can decide myself what's good for me you fascist commie hippie 1 percenter liberal.

I mean, Mr. Nazi, that what my tongue decides to do in it's free time is not any of your business. it's obvious to me that this person, does not believe in freedom. Commie.

As Bill O'reilly said to a liberal "You're a fascist.".
Debate Round No. 2


Dazz forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Dazz 2 years ago
Dear Lordgrae as I told you I couldn't find time to reply so sorry for that, but still if you think it was a troll debate, then I'm surprised as I don't think your presented argument and your quick acceptance of debate challenge was also a part of trolling.
Posted by Lordgrae 2 years ago
I don't want to do this again. This was a troll debate.
Posted by Dazz 2 years ago
Sorry I couldn't get time to post the argument-round 3. Anyway see you next time, if I started a new debate with a similar topic. (will add 5 rounds then surely)
Posted by Dazz 2 years ago
Hi Lordgrae, I'm waiting for your argument against the Title.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by iamanatheistandthisiswhy 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: This vote has to go to Con as he did not forfeit the last round. There were no arguments so argument points are even and pretty much not much else to say regarding the debate. Con didn?t have the best grammar, but then again I cant judge Pro as there was no arguments. Source points shared, as no sources except for a youtube clip.