The Instigator
Noimfarticus
Pro (for)
Tied
7 Points
The Contender
Speechee111807
Con (against)
Tied
7 Points

Acting takes intelligence

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/5/2009 Category: Arts
Updated: 8 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 871 times Debate No: 8111
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

Noimfarticus

Pro

In more serious plays acting takes intelligence 1.You need intelligence to be more realistic 2.The intellegence to put emphasis on the important words 3.The intellegence for the right posture. Thank you to whoever debates whith me
Speechee111807

Con

"Cinema should make you forget you are sitting in a theater." - Roman Polanski
I strongly agree with Roman Polanski, that the theatre should be about having fun and not about how smart you are.
Because I stand in the strong negation of this debate, I have three main contentions as to why
(1) You don't have to be Einstein to act
(2) Acting should be seen as a way to get away from stress, not something to be worried about because of your knowledge and
(3) How the theatre is simply for entertainment
Debate Round No. 1
Noimfarticus

Pro

Noimfarticus forfeited this round.
Speechee111807

Con

Seeing how the opponent has failed to make their case...I will just urget the strong vote on the negation of the debate
Debate Round No. 2
Noimfarticus

Pro

Noimfarticus forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by StephenAlsop 7 years ago
StephenAlsop
NoimfarticusSpeechee111807Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Molokoplus 8 years ago
Molokoplus
NoimfarticusSpeechee111807Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07