Affirmative Action is Racist
Debate Rounds (3)
The first problem with Affirmative Action is it's whole concept it is meant to help "poorer races", but what about the "wealthier races"? Basically of the 4 major races in America from the wealthiest to poorest are as followed: Asians, Whites, Hispanics (a big gap between Whites & Hispanics), and Blacks. This means that Blacks & Hispanics are more likely to receive benefits than Whites & Hispanics. The essential problem with this is that races aren't inherently richer or poorer. There are going to be richer Black people and poorer Asian people, it happens. This means that an Asian family may be suffering bad, but instead of getting a chance it would be given to some rich Black man due to this program. So, if you support a financial support program (which is irrelevant in this debate) it is just racist and ignorant to make it based on race and if a program like this must be run it should look at individual wealth, not race. Affirmative Action will really hurt Whites & Asians, especially poorer ones, not to mention harm and blindly support Blacks & Hispanics.
Under Affirmative Action employers and universities have to put a preference on the "poorer races" (Blacks & Hispanics). The main problem is that is could easily insult a Hispanic or Black person. They may feel that they are being down talked to and that they are lesser people, like babies, who need constant support and benefits. Also, it can teach Blacks & Hispanics that they don't need to be the best they can be, because say some Asian or White guy is acing every test, while a Black or Hispanic guy is losing marks on things, because why should he care? He still might have a better chance against that Asian guy since there are plenty of Asians doing well. This also generally compliments people who are less deserving at the stake of those who worked extra hard, it's dishonest to those who worked ridiculously hard to accomplish high levels of intellect. Affirmative Action doesn't award those who are better, but those who were born and happened to have a ancestors from a certain location, which in itself shouldn't even matter.
Perhaps the biggest problem with Affirmative Action is why is the government so obsessed with race anyways? Historically people have been divided about race for centuries, yet scientific evidence proves there is very little difference between races (of the few none have to do with intellect), yet we still continue to recognize it? Why are we looking at race? As mentioned earlier it would be much better to look at personal wealth. Race is another way to divide people and the last thing we should do is promote people to be divided, especially among something as minor as race. This whole idea that we need to balance races it ridiculous! If you're at an ivy league university, why pay attention to abundance of Asians? Why not look at the great accomplishments and all the smart young adults? Race is an outdated way of viewing the world, let alone to put limits on what people should be allowed to do.
In conclusion Blacks, Hispanics, Whites, and Asians are all hurt one way or another, whether it be babying a group of people or segregate a group of people all by Affirmative Action. Helping "poorer races" is always going to hurt "wealthier races", even though there is exceptions in the whole poor/rich thing in race. It makes it that the more accomplished people may not get awarded for their accomplishments. Not to mention it looks at a primarily outdated view of the world, that really should be dropped.
The Encyclopeadia Britanica, Oxford Dictionary and Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity and Society are unanimous in their definition of Racism -
....views, practices and actions reflecting the belief that humanity is divided into distinct biological groups called races and that members of a certain race share certain attributes which make that group as a whole less desirable, more desirable, inferior, or superior.
I concede defeat if this debate is about whether AA is politically wrong or economically ineffective (and this is what the PRO has done).
But this debate is about whether AA is racist or not, and it is for this reason why PRO already lost the debate.
Affirmative Action (AA) do acknowledge the existence of different races but it does NOT affirm that anyone is racially inferior or superior.
On the contrary, when AA was signed by John F Kennedy, it was the acknolwedgement that certain groups are victims of institutionalized discrimination and marginalization.
Because of discriminization, these groups became disadvantaged socially and economically and denied equal opportunities to education, employment and social standing. And the effects persisted for several generations.
AA was therefore a response to alleviate the effects of racism by removing barriers to opportunity and promote equality and is a far cry from being a policy that promotes racial inferiority or superiority.
You can argue that these maybe politically wrong or economically inefficient but that does not show that AA considers anyone to be racially inferior or superior. Providing assistance to a certain group is not grounded on their racial inferiority but mere acknolwedgement of past historical events that disenfranchised that group.
My arguments stop here. I will not spend time to show whether AA is effective since that is not the spirit of the motion.
In a similar fashion, you can argue all day that Obamacare maybe ineffective but it does not make it racist.
Dylan_Araki forfeited this round.
DT forfeited this round.
Dylan_Araki forfeited this round.
DT forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Ameliamk1 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro managed to point out that anything that favors one race over another is racist. Intention doesn't matter, it's the results.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.