The Instigator
Jacob60rt
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
victoriaronan
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

Airbrushing/photoshop should be made illegal in the media

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Jacob60rt
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/4/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 812 times Debate No: 48335
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

Jacob60rt

Con

I shall take the con side.

The BOP is on the Pro side.

R1- Acceptance only

R2- Opening argument

R3- Cross- Exmanination, Rebuttals, etc. You may present a new argument to defend your case.

R4- Final thoughts, Rebuttals, etc. No new arguments.

All I ask is a good, respectful debate. Lets have fun.
victoriaronan

Pro

I accept your debate challenge.
Debate Round No. 1
Jacob60rt

Con

I will take the moment to thank my opponent for accepting my debate.

1.Airbrushing/ Photo shop is a great tool that be can used to help people, and it truly does.
2.There is no considerable reason why these tools should be outlawed.
3.Why should a few select people due to there misuse of the product as a scapegoat?
4.The main issue that comes up is anxeria and insecurity. Many men and women use this product to change or alter their photos because they don't look a certain way. This is not the fault of the product or the makers but merely the problem of the view society and the projected image upon these people.
victoriaronan

Pro

victoriaronan forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Jacob60rt

Con

.....sigh.....
victoriaronan

Pro

victoriaronan forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Jacob60rt

Con

Do you guys know any good jokes?
victoriaronan

Pro

victoriaronan forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Taylur 2 years ago
Taylur
I agree with con. Before photographs, paintings were often 'flattering'. If you had an ugly wart on your nose, would you pay a lot of money to have an artist depict you as lifelike as possible? Probably not. You'd want to be 'airbrushed'.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by daytonanerd 2 years ago
daytonanerd
Jacob60rtvictoriaronanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: FF