Aliens are Real
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Mothman
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 3/30/2014 | Category: | Science | ||
| Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 594 times | Debate No: | 51253 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (3)
 Con Rules: Round One: I will post the rules and my opponent will post their argument. Round Two: I will post my argument and my opponent will post their rebuttals. Round Three: I will post my rebuttals and my opponent will state "no round as agreed upon." Failure to follow rules will result in a 7 point deduction.  Pro 2. It is impossible to disprove the existence of ETs because you would have to search every inch of the universe, and other universes 3. They could be microscopic. 4. UFOs exist, The Tinley Park case is the best evidence These UFOs were proven not to be flares, they have to be, a. Top Secret Government Craft, or aliens 5. The meteor found in Antarctica proves there was life on mars http://www.telegraph.co.uk... 6. Europa may have life on it. Conclusion since it is impossible to disprove the existence of life on other planets, it is not possible to say there is no life on other planets. Probability suggests there is life on other planets. I leave it to Con to search the entire universe and show me it is all dead. |
 |
|
Con goldtrotter forfeited this round.
Pro Aliens are Real, and Con can't disprove it, ameen |
 |
|
Con goldtrotter forfeited this round.
Pro |
 |
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by WheezySquash8 3 years ago
| goldtrotter | Mothman | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con forfeited and pro cited sources.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
| goldtrotter | Mothman | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: "I leave it to Con to search the entire universe and show me it is all dead." One of the most easily refuted points I've seen, and yet it still intimidated goldtrotter away... No contest and forfeit.
Vote Placed by Enoch_deftinwolf 3 years ago
| goldtrotter | Mothman | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: well, this was pointless.
This is a bad argument to use.
In fact it's a bad debate as neither side has any real data. life has been found on 1 planet in the observable universe. the odds could be so infinitesimally small of life existing that the earth is the only case, without more data we shall never know.