The Instigator
lastrequest691
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
studentathletechristian8
Con (against)
Winning
33 Points

Aliens are not saved and must be saved

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/20/2010 Category: Religion
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,205 times Debate No: 12374
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (7)

 

lastrequest691

Pro

Aliens will never get saved

Aliens will not get saved

My topic is based on the fact that when Adam sinned God cursed the whole universe and if Aliens do exist on the far reaches of the universe they are also suffering from this curse.

But since Christ only came to Earth the Aliens are not redeemed yet. Poor people! I feel sorry for them but that is the truth.

Since Christ is the only way to paradise so there is no way an Alien can get saved because he does not believe in Christ?

So we need to build sophisticated aircrafts that can travel the far reaches of this universe and other universes to save the Aliens. Once they know about Christ then only they will be saved.
Here we go.

Let the first round begin.
studentathletechristian8

Con

I thank my opponent for the debate.

I shall negate the resolution, "Aliens are not saved and must be saved."

It is apparent that my opponent is referring to this definition of "alien":

a creature from outer space; extraterrestrial. [1]

It is also apparent that my opponent is referring to this definition of "saved":

to deliver from the power and consequences of sin. [2]

In order to affirm the resolution, my opponent must prove three things:

1) aliens exist

2) aliens are not saved

3) aliens must be saved

Thus far, my opponent has not been able to prove the first point or the third point. He made a weak argument regarding the second point. He cannot even argue the second point until he proves that aliens do exist.

My opponent also has the burden of proof in this scenario.

I thank my opponent for the debate. I have given him an outline for argumentation.

Thank you.

Sources:

[1] http://dictionary.reference.com... : Subset 4.

[2] http://dictionary.reference.com... : Subset 9.
Debate Round No. 1
lastrequest691

Pro

lastrequest691 forfeited this round.
studentathletechristian8

Con

Oh no. Let's hope for clarification in the third round.
Debate Round No. 2
lastrequest691

Pro

lastrequest691 forfeited this round.
studentathletechristian8

Con

Well, it looks like my opponent forfeited the debate. It would have also been nice for my opponent to prove that Christ existed, why Christianity should be determined as a valid belief, etc. Nevertheless, my opponent forfeited. I urge a Con vote. Thank you.
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by xoxoJenniferxoxo 6 years ago
xoxoJenniferxoxo
This is disgraceful! You are turning peoples beliefs into dust. You may not believe in that but be respectful and youve got a thing to prove aswell.

- How are you sure that aliens dont exist?
- How can you be so positive abotu christs not real?

I want an answer. CHOP CHOP! Btw you dont seem very christian.
Posted by studentathletechristian8 6 years ago
studentathletechristian8
I apologize for wasting the first round. I'd be happy to argue in the second and third rounds.
Posted by GeoLaureate8 6 years ago
GeoLaureate8
He did establish that in the first paragraph. You don't need bullet points to establish a position.

This debate is not about whether aliens exist or not. Yet you turned it into that. That is an entirely separate debate in and of itself.
Posted by studentathletechristian8 6 years ago
studentathletechristian8
I am negating the resolution. Pro should have established guidelines that were very clear.

If I have done anything undesirable, then my opponent will inform me in Round 2. My opponent still needs to elaborate WHY aliens must be saved if they do exist.

Relax.
Posted by GeoLaureate8 6 years ago
GeoLaureate8
SAC8, that was epic fail. Pro doesn't have to prove aliens exist. He said, IF aliens exist, then they ought to be saved. This debate is under the assumption that aliens exist. You missed the whole point of the entire debate. Also, he did briefly explain why aliens need to be saved.

Pro, maybe you ought to submit this debate to someone who is a bit more serious.
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by MB17 2 years ago
MB17
lastrequest691studentathletechristian8Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Shestakov 6 years ago
Shestakov
lastrequest691studentathletechristian8Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by FREEDO 6 years ago
FREEDO
lastrequest691studentathletechristian8Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Atheism 6 years ago
Atheism
lastrequest691studentathletechristian8Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Vote Placed by Koopin 6 years ago
Koopin
lastrequest691studentathletechristian8Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Strikeeagle84015 6 years ago
Strikeeagle84015
lastrequest691studentathletechristian8Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Vote Placed by studentathletechristian8 6 years ago
studentathletechristian8
lastrequest691studentathletechristian8Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:02