The Instigator
Feizel8
Pro (for)
Tied
3 Points
The Contender
AvalonXQ
Con (against)
Tied
3 Points

Aliens do exist.They just haven't made themselves public yet.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/16/2013 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 748 times Debate No: 33773
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

Feizel8

Pro

I believe in the existence of extraterrestrials.I'll argue to prove that point while my opponent will argue that aliens don't exist.
AvalonXQ

Con

I will take the skeptical position, which is that there is no evidence sufficient to convince a reasonable person that extraterrestrials currently exist on Earth.
Debate Round No. 1
Feizel8

Pro

Great.
This is how it's gonna lwork.
Round 1- Prove your point.
Round 2- Prove your point
Round 3- Conclusion

Key Concepts:
UFO - Unidentified Flying Object
Alien/Extraterrestrial - A being or form belonging to any world in our universe except Earth.

Anything else you wanna add?
AvalonXQ

Con

Sorry... I'm new. Hasn't this back-and-forth already used up Rounds #1 and #2?
Debate Round No. 2
Feizel8

Pro

Sorry about that,I'm also new and I think we just made a mistake.Let me remake the debate and challenge you so we do this right.I'm also new by the way.
AvalonXQ

Con

I look forward to it.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Ragnar 4 years ago
Ragnar
I suggest one or two rounds for each side to present a case (the first of which having no rebuttals), followed by a round of just rebuttals, and finally a round of defense against rebuttals.
Posted by Ragnar 4 years ago
Ragnar
IMO the resolution implies that they have the means to make themselves public.

Linking evidence to extra terrestrials, may be a challenge for pro. If his argument is that of ignorance (well you can't prove that they are not!) than I will probably vote against him. If con plays semantics and argues that aliens refers to job stealing illegal immigrants, I will probably vote against him.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by MassiveDump 4 years ago
MassiveDump
Feizel8AvalonXQTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: This should be a tie.
Vote Placed by danielawesome12 4 years ago
danielawesome12
Feizel8AvalonXQTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro failed to debate. "Sorry about that,I'm also new and I think we just made a mistake.Let me remake the debate and challenge you so we do this right.I'm also new by the way."