The Instigator
Hypocriticism
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Mike_10-4
Con (against)
Winning
14 Points

All religious prophets who would arise from 2014 would be diagnosed with mental disorders/illnesses.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Mike_10-4
Voting Style: Open Point System: Select Winner
Started: 11/11/2014 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 525 times Debate No: 64940
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (5)
Votes (3)

 

Hypocriticism

Pro

Prophet, in the context of this debate, relates specifically to someone who not only claims to be speaking of the one true philosophy but that a supernatural entity is speaking through them. So, yes, Buddha would not be a prophet according to this debate.

The prophet must not only believe they are speaking the words of this supernatural entity that that the entity physically created everything except for itself, is the source of all morality and that questioning anything about the religion is a sin within that religion.

If any further clarification is required, please post in comments.

Minimum of 15 debates already completed to qualify as my contestant. Thank you.

R1: Acceptance.

R2: Opening arguments, no rebuttals unless connected to argument.

R3: Rebuttals, offensive style.

R4: Rebuttals, defensive style.

R5: Closing statement, no new rebuttals or arguments.
Mike_10-4

Con

I accept. This should be an interesting debate.
Debate Round No. 1
Hypocriticism

Pro

Hypocriticism forfeited this round.
Mike_10-4

Con

Well there you have it. Pro's "account is no longer active." Possibly, Pro is one of those religious prophets who arise in 2014, and according to Pro, prophets are "diagnosed with mental disorders/illnesses;" perhaps, they came and took Pro away.

This is rich! What a unique way in trying to win a debate.
Debate Round No. 2
Hypocriticism

Pro

Hypocriticism forfeited this round.
Mike_10-4

Con

Waiting for Pro's return.
Debate Round No. 3
Hypocriticism

Pro

Hypocriticism forfeited this round.
Mike_10-4

Con

Waiting for Pro's return.
Debate Round No. 4
Hypocriticism

Pro

Hypocriticism forfeited this round.
Mike_10-4

Con

Waited for Pro's return.
Debate Round No. 5
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by cheyennebodie 2 years ago
cheyennebodie
Liberalism is the real mental disorder. All their thinking is upside down from reality.

You ungodly will have your chance. There is a time in the near future you will have this planet to run without our influence. We will have to come back to stop the total destruction of all life .

You mean we would be better off like what you did to our schools. Ridlin, metal detectors, uncontrolled sex and abortions. You sure have a real utopia going for you.
Posted by Hypocriticism 2 years ago
Hypocriticism
It means that I think that religion is something that shouldn't be involved with any policy making but furthermore that regardless of which religion may be true, I would eradicate form this world in the blink of an eye given the chance.

In a secular world, the good would be good anyway and the evil would be evil not out of fear of eternal punishment but out of genuine tendency for either malice or benevolence.
Posted by Theunkown 2 years ago
Theunkown
What does it mean to have secular religion? its on your profile, I would send PM but you blocked it.
Posted by Hypocriticism 2 years ago
Hypocriticism
If my opponent attacks only less developed nations, I will point this out and explain why this is not valid to take down the whole resolution. In addition, thanks to the internet there is no such thing as a truly 'undeveloped' nation anymore other than North Korea. Information is everything.
Posted by Bubbagump282 2 years ago
Bubbagump282
Depending on context. I would recommend adding "In first world countries" to the title of the debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Tweka 2 years ago
Tweka
HypocriticismMike_10-4
Who won the debate:-Vote Checkmark
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
HypocriticismMike_10-4
Who won the debate:-Vote Checkmark
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
HypocriticismMike_10-4
Who won the debate:--
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's argument was the most believable, Should not have forfeited.