The Instigator
Max.Wallace
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
sboss18
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

All votes by adults should be counted in every poll, everywhere.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
sboss18
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/5/2016 Category: Politics
Updated: 4 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 261 times Debate No: 95882
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (1)

 

Max.Wallace

Pro

I can hardly wait for a child or an adult idiot to converse on this issue. Bring it.
sboss18

Con

Disregarding the blatant ad hominem my opponent opens his statement with, I accept. I will be arguing that there exist some polls that are unnecessary to be counted.



I assume Round 1 is simply for acceptance, so I will wait for Pro to present their opening arguments.



Happy debating!

Debate Round No. 1
Max.Wallace

Pro

well you assumed, I submit...
sboss18

Con

As my opponent has essentially forfeited Round 2, I will begin my counterargument.

There are two types of polls that come to mind when discussing whether or not the individual votes need to be counted: unanimous ones, and informal ones. Or a combination of both, for that matter.

For example, say you are in a room with 19 other people, and you bring up the topic of what to eat for dinner. If you ask the group, "Who wants pizza?" and every single person, including you, raises your hand, it is unnecessary to take the time to count every single person in the room. If you think that number of people is too small, then just generalize the scenario to an arbitrarily large number of people, where the amount of time to count becomes too much of a burden, when taken into account the fact that the vote is visibly unanimous and, again, informal in nature.

It is easy to see that not every single poll of all time needs to be counted when you take cases like these into account.
Debate Round No. 2
Max.Wallace

Pro

Admit you are an establishment scuz, and you win. It's that easy.
sboss18

Con

My argument still stands. My opponent is refusing to take the debate seriously and continues to deliver ad hominems. Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by sboss18 2 months ago
sboss18
You never presented an actual case; it was an easy win.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 months ago
Max.Wallace
The circle won. DDo's plan.
Posted by Pilchsawyer 4 months ago
Pilchsawyer
Your topic was that boring I really can't remember wjat it was about.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 4 months ago
dsjpk5
Max.Wallacesboss18Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con was the only one who made an argument, so arguments to Con by default.