The Instigator
AmericaTheFatherland
Pro (for)
Tied
14 Points
The Contender
Aerogant
Con (against)
Tied
14 Points

America was founded on Judeo-Christian values.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/16/2014 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 729 times Debate No: 60552
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (6)

 

AmericaTheFatherland

Pro

Morality without God is completely useless.
Aerogant

Con

America was founded from fleeing from judeo-christian values.

This debate was founded on your sheep-mentality.

god was founded on your ego

everything you do was founded on hatred
Debate Round No. 1
AmericaTheFatherland

Pro

http://www.americanthinker.com...

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org...

http://www.americanvaluesnetwork.org...

http://www.democraticunderground.com...

These prove our nation was based on Judeo-Christian values which preserved freedom and fights tyranny.

Next time, be respectful of others' beliefs.
Aerogant

Con

It proves why you are a hateful speck on the face of this planet letting out the smelly religious farts in the air, actually. The entire Declaration of Independence is about our freedom and separation from church and state. Again, you believe everything you read out of your hatred because you cannot see through the flames for the life of you. Your life must have been very pathetic for you to abandon it for these lies people drum up for control - and you were just talking about people being controlled, while you're being controlled right now by believing in this BS. Then you complain about a "disease", when if you look now, you'll see that your hatred is a disease. Judge more hammer boy, you're just a good for nothing hypocrite that's selfish and worthless to the face of mankind.
Debate Round No. 2
AmericaTheFatherland

Pro

http://www.whatchristianswanttoknow.com...

You are supporting evil, and discouraging good. You're in jeopardy of God's judgment, if you die, judgment will be set for you on judgment day. Repent and accept Jesus Christ ad your savior for he died for you 2000 years ago so you wouldn't face your sins in hell. Hell was made for the devil and his angels but because of sin and lack of repentance, humanity ends up there. So repent and receive your salvation today.

God bless you and shalom.
Aerogant

Con

No, you're supporting lies and I'm fighting for the truth. You're such a bloody fool, it saddens me. Yeah, judgement, bla bla. You don't faze me, because you're a joke who just regurgitates the same logical fallacies since the dawn of human stupidity. You must be REALLY PATHETIC to judge your own men for an imaginary friend.
Debate Round No. 3
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by RulerOfNone 3 years ago
RulerOfNone
I'm not voting for either of you, because you're both insufferable twunts.
Posted by Boesball 3 years ago
Boesball
It's facts versus insanity. If you've read the Declaration of Independence, you'd know for sure it's formed on Judeo-Christian values...
Posted by Aerogant 3 years ago
Aerogant
Since whence was a debate ever, in the history of mankind, about the facts? One person is always wanting to be right despite who is factually correct!
Posted by Boesball 3 years ago
Boesball
This is debating whether a fact is correct or not.
Posted by Boesball 3 years ago
Boesball
This is debating whether a fact is correct or not.
Posted by Aerogant 3 years ago
Aerogant
You cannot disavow what was written and has been the history of the founding fathers, on top of their intentions of getting away from judeo-christianity. Learn your history boys! the bible is not history - it's ALLEGORY.
Posted by TruthHurts 3 years ago
TruthHurts
It's unfortunate that Aerogant hijacked this debate, because the Founders, in the Treaty of Tripoli, explicitly disavowed this notion.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by thett3 3 years ago
thett3
AmericaTheFatherlandAerogantTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: No one deserves a win here.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 3 years ago
9spaceking
AmericaTheFatherlandAerogantTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: pro's sources don't exactly support his resolution
Vote Placed by Codedlogic 3 years ago
Codedlogic
AmericaTheFatherlandAerogantTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro failed to put forth an argument to support their proposition and instead just provided links. This is not a valid form of debate for this forum.
Vote Placed by CodyLTJames 3 years ago
CodyLTJames
AmericaTheFatherlandAerogantTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro kept it civil
Vote Placed by Manastacious 3 years ago
Manastacious
AmericaTheFatherlandAerogantTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: I award conduct and arguments to the con on the simple reason that the Pro attempted to use sources as his argumentation. That is not debating. That is creating a bibliography.
Vote Placed by KhalifV 3 years ago
KhalifV
AmericaTheFatherlandAerogantTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: Con is correct. However both argued poorly and attacked eachother