I believe that the God described here does in fact exist,and it is professed by various religions including the major monotheistic religions including Islam,Judaism, and Christianity. God exists because we exist,nature exist,justice exist good and evil exist because the universe exist. The Kalam argument that there is cause for the universe to exist everything and everyone has a purpose this is why they currently exist,if you think about it for a moment there isn't many things that exist and do not have a purpose so my argument is just BECAUSE were discussing god it makes him real or he exists .God is omnipotent in the fact that he created the universe it takes quite a skilled hand to create such a thing like the Earth,the Earth is the perfect size and is perfect in it's distance from the sun any variation in degree could mean we burn up or we freeze. God is loving in the fact that he loves all his creations. I am finished and await my opponent's rebuttal Thank You.
I asked for logical reasoning that could potentially give evidence to an all loving, omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent "God." You started off your argument by stating "I believe". Beliefs do not suffice as any form of logical reasoning. It is possible to say that the universe has existed at every point in time and that at no point in time has there been no universe. Time is an aspect of the universe. There was no "time" before the universe. Without a time before, the idea of cause no longer appertains. Later you say: "so my argument is just BECAUSE were discussing god it makes him real or he exists".. so essentially by that same logic, if we were to go on and discuss a flying spaghetti monster, would that too be real or exist? No, that is completely illogical. I would like to see your sources on the supposition that "the Earth is the perfect size and is perfect in it's distance from the sun any variation in degree.." No 'proof' that the perfect "God" I described exists was given.
When I said I "Believed" I said that to state my personal belief in a god in no ways did I express this as "Proof" of god's existence. Well on "the variation of degree" my opponent should note how other planets are inhospitable they don't and can't sustain life Earth is perfect size,  The Earth's size and corresponding gravity holds a thin layer of mostly nitrogen and oxygen gases, only extending about 50 miles above the Earth's surface. If Earth were smaller, an atmosphere would be impossible, like the planet Mercury. If Earth were larger, its atmosphere would contain free hydrogen, like Jupiter, Earth is the only known planet equipped with an atmosphere of the right mixture of gases to sustain plant, animal and human life. So now there is one explanation for the "just right" conditions of Earth a creator who knows what he is doing and does not see science as an enemy but rather utilizes science for his creations.
The source provided is not viable, it is an atheist forum where everyone is disproving God.
What I am getting from what you just said is because of the fact that our planet in this solar system contains life, that must mean that there is an all loving, omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent God? I would gladly disagree with that. My opponent is making a broad generalization. Please understand the massive size of the universe we live in. How does a single planet being inhabited prove there is a "creator"? My opponent later says "...does not see science as an enemy but rather utilizes science for his creations." This creator uses science for his creations and yet allows 99.9% of species to inhabit this planet die out? Does that logically make sense that "God" loved his creations so much that he would let the vast majority of them go extinct? This "creator" is either impotent, uncaring, or non-existent.
Well, speaking of logic how can 99.9% of the species die out if the Human Race and Animal Kingdom are still very much vibrant and alive unless he means death which is a natural process. And just because the atheism forum contradicts my argument doesn't mean it's not valid. The evidence I present,which my opponent has barely one example for his argument,is that God can explain the inconsistencies of evolution such as how life began or how anything began. My other example will be the Genome code which is an  extremely sophisticated genetic language necessary for even the simplest life forms to exist. Called by Bill Clinton "The Language of The Creator".So my argument is as follows 1. that everything has a cause and 2. there is evidence for design. Now,I will ask to those that will be voting to look at HIS evidence which is minimal,he has not supplemented his argument but has only rebutted my arguments. Other than that I like to thank my opponent for a wonderful debate vote PRO. http://www.andrewcorbett.net...
Reasons for voting decision: Countering qopel's vote and giving the win to Con. Pro had burden of proof for affirming his resolution, but didn't even present any evidence for his claim that God doesn't exist. All he did was attempt to argue against Con's points. That doesn't work in a debate when Pro is the one making the positive claim.