Because there is nothing objectively, rationally or non-arbitrarily immoral with pond scum interacting in anyway with other pond scum, there can be nothing objectively, rationally or non-arbitrarily immoral with evolved pond scum interacting in anyway with other pond scum, right?
After all, ethics are non-material and cannot be accounted for in a atheist worldview.
I am an atheist and have strong moral convictions. Therefore, your assertions are incorrect. The religious point of view is a view that is tainted with the lusts and desires of the ruling classes. All religions were originated from the ruling classes and are thus tainted with their desires and weaknesses. Monks cannot marry, not because of their devotion to god, but because the church needs to preserve private property and thus can't allow church land to be divided by any subsequent offspring that marriage may bring. Thus, we can plainly see that religion is tainted with earthly restrictions which has nothing to do with God.
Please read my post more carefully next time. I did not say atheist have no morals. I said they have no objective, rational and non-arbitrary morality. If you say otherwise, tell us where does evolved pond scum get objective, ration and non-arbitrary morality?
Religious people are evolved pond scum also. Therefore, we are all in the same boat. Thus, you have no argument. Note - Religious people have a dislike and avoidance of rational thinking. Thus, they incapable of being either objective or rational. Note - Morality pertains to a group consensus of behaviour and has nothing to do with any God.
This is another good example of why young people should avoid religion in general. It is usually run by irrational nut cases who hate logic, rationalism and philosophy. Thank you for providing clear evidence that religion is a foul pursuit that is followed by slippery slimy individuals.