Anarchy would be beneficial to a Western civilized nation
Debate Rounds (3)
Secondly I am a firm believer that we have to take a tough stance and be criticism against the government we choose and the representatives we bring to power, in my opinion we must know how to use democracy with the purpose for which it was created , to represent the will of the people , so, we must not only reject the incompetence of the leaders which we chose, we must also need to take action against them, not in a silence and civil disobedience actuated, but in a position of demanding our rights.
Finally in relation to the claim that you state about the benefits of social anarchy goods, I believe that this is an issue in which we must be the principal actors of change and also the head and voice of our right, we can't just lose a fight we hadn't fight , it is our responsibility to force our representatives to established justice in favor of what we want and the people in generally want, we must use the power of the people, the power of the democracy not the rebellion of the anarchism to restore our rights, this process may take years , even centuries , so it is our responsibility to give a "push" , and decide what we want, but decide with our voice and actions, not only with social disobedience.
To conclude my first argument, I believe that social anarchism is not the solution to the problems that beset society , being the solution I propose to demand our votes and rights to the ones we chose . Changing things by the correct use of our voices.
We had the right to modify and create the rules we must use this to achieve major development and social equality , plus of course , great economic prosperity, being the democracy the system in which I believe, this may look like the difficult, sometimes the impossible one, but if the people will wanted we as a society will became great.
I'm not a native speaker, sorry for my grammar.
MattsDebate forfeited this round.
Jcamp forfeited this round.
Wow I have no idea what democratic nation you are referring to which actually implements these rights to its people but I sure do like this place. It's a joke to assume that our voice will be heard be heard in a nation which sets its economy and personal bank accounts over the needs of its people. For example; in Australia we have asylum seekers escaping persecution to our 'free nation'. Our government has sent these forgotten people to PNG (Papa New Guniea) which is a 3rd world nation where there is a 70% likely chance for a woman to be sexually assaulted or raped in any given form. There has been cries from people and the UN and the government still isn't listening so your statement is invalid when you said that using our voices will achieve results. History suggests that only PRESSURE has FORCED these people to make changes as they have been threatened from a potential force, it has never been about the voice. Take African American rights for example, they spoke out for years and were persecuted for it, it was the pressure and support from people that got them out of a massive state of oppression, the leaders did not give two shits about what they had to say before hand.
Also you talked about welfare. Imagine a nation where businesses weren't allowed to rip you off for their own money hungry agenda (mass profit), a nation where equality is excepted and people have accessibility to jobs. This nation requires no welfare. Australia is a country NOT a company, we can not bring the 'economy' into the equation when it is STILL not benefiting people when it is going well and it treats them worse when it is down. Also I am talking about overthrowing the current government, every nation needs a leader and we can impose one which does not have the same power which the previous government had, and it only operates in the interests of its people. Also the economy would not be necessary if we used old school methods of currency, independent to Australia considering that it doesn't need external forces to help provide for it. We can use the method of trade, even overseas instead of the method of 'OH NO I NEED MORE MONEY TO PAY FOR SOMETHING WHICH IS TAXED AND I CURRENTLY CAN'T AFFORD IT BECAUSE MY MONEY WAS TAXED and oh what are they going to do with that money for me or people in need? FERKING NOTHING!' I am considering a new system, not the abolishment of trade and the economy, not forgetting about minorities. Silence is a Government's bestfriend and social anarchism will give us our rights.
These countries treat us like a company. You say that we have the right to vote but we are limited as to our choice of leadership because of our limitations and the propaganda of media to tell us that this much freedom is as good as it gets and we should accept it and feel greatful for it. SCREW THAT! we should reach for FREEDOM, lets not settle for less.
And I would like to apologise for sloppy answering, I had 9 minutes lol
Jcamp forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by funwiththoughts 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||4||0|
Reasons for voting decision: FF.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.